مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

بررسی و پهنه بندی پتانسیل خطر وقوع زمین لغزش در حوضه آبخیز خانیان تنکابن با استفاده از روش تحلیل شبکه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استاد ژئومورفولوژی، گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی.
2 دانشجوی دکتری ژئومورفولوژی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی.
10.22034/jess.2024.470898.2284
چکیده
زمین لغزش ها از پرحادثه ترین مخاطرات طبیعی دنیا می باشند و شناخت ارزیابی و پهنه بندی خطر زمین لغزش ها می توانددر مدیریت، کنترل، مهار و کاهش میزان خسارات موثر می باشد. در این پژوهش به منظور ارزیابی خطر وقوع زمین لغزش در محدوده مطالعاتی خانیان( واقع در باختر استان مازندران و جنوب خاوری شهرستان تنکابن)، از روش که یک روش تصیم گیری ANP که یک روش فراگیر و چند منظوره تصیم گیری استفاده شده است. در این پژوهش از ده لایه اطلاعاتی شامل لیتولوژی، فاصله از گسل، شیب، جهت شیب، تراز ارتفاعی، کاربری اراضی، فاصله از جاده، بارش، فاصله از رودخانه و تراکم چشمه ها به عنوان عوامل موثر در وقوع زمین لغزش در نظر گرفته شده است. پس از تعیین تاثیر و وزن هر کدام از این عوامل در وقوع زمین لغزش با استفاده از روش ANP و تجزیه وتحلیل و وارد کردن هریک از این عوامل به صورت لایه اطلاعاتی در نرم افزار Arc GIS و تلفیق آن ها بر اساس وزن های تعیین شده، نقشه پهنه بندی مخاطره زمین لغزش در محدوده مطالعاتی تهیه شده است. نتایج مدل نشان داد روش ANP از دقت زیادی برخوردار می باشد، ترتیب اولویت بندی عوامل موثر در آن منطقی و قابل قبول بوده که در این میان با توجه به عوامل موثر زمین لغزش روش ANP، پارامترهای شیب زمین با وزن 0.29، کاربری اراضی با وزن 0.24 و لیتولوژی با وزن 0.20 بیشترین اهمیت را در توسعه زمین لغزش به خود اختصاص داده اند، چون امکان مقایسه زیرمعیارها را فراهم می کند. با توجه به بازدیدهای میدانی می توان اذعان داشت که استفاده از روش ANP از دقت نسبی بالایی جهت مطالعه زمین لغزش برخودار است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating and zoning the risk potential of landslides in Khanian Tankabon watershed using network analysis method (ANP)

نویسندگان English

Mousa Abedini 1
fatemeh salimadeh 2
1 Professor in geomorphology, Faculty of Environment, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2 PhD Student in Departmen of Physical Geography, (Geomorphology), University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
چکیده English

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Introduction

Landslides are one of the most frequent natural hazards in the world, and knowing the assessment and risk zoning of landslides can be effective in managing, controlling, controlling and reducing the amount of damage. The main purpose of this research is to investigate and evaluate the risk of landslides in the Khanian watershed (located in the west of Mazandaran province and southeast of Tankabon city).In order to conduct this research, a multi-criteria decision making method of the network analysis process (ANP) was used. The information layers included lithology, distance from the fault, slope, direction of slope, height level, land use, distance from the road, precipitation, distance from the river and density of springs as effective factors in the occurrence of landslides.
The study area of Khanian is one of the three thousand sub-basins of Tonkabon, which is located in the west of Mazandaran province and the southeast of Tonkabon city (Figure 1). Its area is about 2918.44 hectares. The studied area of Khanian watershed is located in longitude 50 degrees 55 minutes 11 seconds to 50 degrees 56 minutes 16 seconds and latitude 36 degrees 33 minutes 12 seconds to 36 degrees 41 seconds. In terms of political divisions, this basin is located in the south of Tankabon city and is considered one of the sub-basins of Sehazar River. Almost the entire access route to its central and southern parts is located in the mountainous and high area, and in this sense, it is considered among the very high watersheds. In addition, the general direction of the Khanian watershed is south to north, and in the south of the basin, they form the Sehazar River in the course of its intersection with each other. Also, the highest elevations of the basin are located in its southern part. Its maximum height is 4794 meters, and its minimum height is 319 meters. The average annual rainfall of the region is about 800 mm and its climate type according to the Dumarten method is a cold humid climate. In terms of vegetation, it is part of the semi-dense forest areas and the species present in it include beech, comfrey and alder.

Materials and methods
In this research, in order to assess the risk of landslides in the studied watershed, an integrated approach based on field studies, expert opinions and spatial modeling was used. 10 key factors used including lithology, fault, slope, slope direction, topographic level, land use, road, precipitation, river and springs were considered. Digital maps of height with a resolution of 10 meters, slope, direction of slope, geology with a scale of 1:100000, land use, fault, river and slip points were prepared. Validation of these layers was done using field visits and satellite images. Field studies were conducted in two stages. In the first stage, landslide-prone points were identified by considering geological evidence, morphology, land use and visual evidence such as cracks, minor landslides and weak vegetation. In the second stage, at each suspicious point, more detailed information was collected, including rock type, geological structure, current land use, slope and slope direction, distance from the river, the presence of faults, the amount of weathering, sliding blocks, surface materials, and the distance from the watershed. . In the next step, the accuracy and validity of the collected information layers were carefully checked and evaluated.
Analytical Network Method (ANP) as an extension of Analytical Hierarchy Method (AHP), is able to model correlations and feedbacks between elements in a decision making process. Compared to AHP, this method takes into account all the internal effects of the effective components in decision-making and enters into the calculations. In the AHP model, only criteria are related to their superior criteria. This means that the criteria are dependent on the goals, the sub-criteria are dependent on the criteria and the options are dependent on the sub-criteria. But the dependence between the criteria itself is not considered. In contrast, the ANP model, in addition to the hierarchical dependencies of AHP, also includes side effects and feedback between elements. In this model, not only the clusters affect the elements and the elements affect the options, but the options affect the elements and even the elements themselves affect each other and other clusters.
Results and discussion
The results of the model showed that the ANP method is very accurate, the order of prioritization of the effective factors in it is reasonable and acceptable, in the meantime, according to the effective factors of landslides in the ANP method, the slope parameters with a weight of 0.29 Land use with a weight of 0.24 and lithology with a weight of 0.20 have the most importance in the development of landslides, because it provides the possibility of comparing sub-criteria.
Conclusion

Field studies and investigation of the effective factors in landslides show that the existence of land slope and geological formations and the change of land use and the construction of villas on the slopes due to the touristic nature of the studied area strongly cause the occurrence of landslides. It is possible, the destruction of pastures and loss of vegetation is effective in intensifying landslides in the researched basin. Statistical analysis shows that the highest density of landslides occurred on the side of the roads, especially in the distance class of 0 to 100 meters of the road. This issue shows the direct relationship between the construction of the road and the occurrence of landslides in this area. In the northern watersheds of the country, in order to exploit the forest, build a network of access roads for logging operations, and also build roads for the residents, many roads have been built.
The results of the model showed that the ANP method is very accurate, the order of prioritization of the effective factors in it is reasonable and acceptable, in the meantime, according to the effective factors of the landslide of the ANP method, the land slope parameters with a weight of 0.29, land use with a weight 0.24 and lithology with a weight of 0.20 have been assigned the most importance in the development of landslides, because it allows the comparison of sub-criteria. According to the field visits, it can be acknowledged that the use of the ANP method has a relatively high accuracy for the study of landslides.

.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Landslide
hazards
ANP network analysis method
Khanian watershed
1.      امیراحمدی، آ ،شکاری بادی، ع.و معتمدی راد، م.(1394). پهنه بندی خطر زمینلغزش با استفاده از مدل ANP (مطالعه موردی: حوضه پیوژن- دامنه جنوبی بینالود)، پژوهش های ژئومورفولوژی کمی4،(3)،230-214.
2.      خواجوند، ر.(1394). مطالعه ژئوتکنیکی و زیست محیطی زمین لغزش غرب روستای گت‌کش منطقه کجور نوشهر. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی زمین‌شناسی محیط زیست، 9 (33)،61 -47.
3.      رحیم پور، ت، روستایی، ش، نخستین روحی، م. (1396). پهنه بندی خطر وقوع زمین لغزش با استفاده از فرآیند تحلیل سلسه مراتبی AHPدر محیط GIS (مطالعه موردی: حوضه آبریز سردول چای استان اردبیل)  هیدروژئومورفولوژی (13)، 20-1.
4.      شیرانی، ک، عرب عامری، ع.(1394). پهنه بندی وقوع خطر زمین لغزش با استفاده از روش رگرسیون لجستیک (مطالعه موردی: حوضه دز علیا) مجله علوم و فنون کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، علوم آب و خاک، سال نوزدهم، (72)، 334-321.
5.      عابدینی، م، بهشتی جاوید، ا، فتحی، م.(1394). پهنه بندی حساسیت خطر وقوع زمین لغزش با مدل های آماری دو متغیره و منطق فازی ( مطالعه موردی: حوضه آبخیز رودخانه بالخلو)، جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی محیطی، سال 26 پیاپی 59، (3)، 34-60.
6.      عابدینی، م، روستایی؛ ش، فتحی؛ م.(1395). پهنه بندی حساسیت وقوع زمین لغرش با استفاده از مدل هیبریدی قضیه بیز- ANP . کرانه جنوبی حوضه آبخیز اهرچای از روستای نصیر کندی تا سد ستارخان، پژوهش های ژئومورفولوژی کمی، 5، (1) ، 159-142.
7.      فرجی سبک بار، ح.، سلمانی، م، فریدونی، ف، کریم زاده، ح، و رحیمی، ح. 1389. مکان یابی محل دفن  بهداشتی زباله ی روستایی با استفاده از مدل فرایند تحلیل شبکه ای ANP : مطالعه موردی: نواحی روستایی شهرستان قوچان، فصل نامه مدرس علوم انسانی، 14، (1) ، 149- 127.
8.      قنواتی، ع، (1390). پهنه بندی خطر زمین لغزش در حوضه جاجرود استان تهران با استفاده از مدل روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی ، نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، (20)، 68-51.
9.      کرم،ع.(1383). کاربرد مدل ترکیب خطی وزنی در پهنه بندی زمین لغزش (مطالعه موردی: منطقه سرخون چهارسال بختیاری)، مجله جغرافیا و توسعه،2 ،(4)،136-134
10.  محمودی، ف .(1347). ژئومورفولوژی دینامیک، چاپ دوم، انتشارات پیام نور.
11.  متولی، ص.(1396). پهنه‌بندی زمین لغزش در حوضه آبخیز خانیان تنکابن با استفاده از مدل ارزش اطلاعات Winf. فصلنامه جغرافیای طبیعی، 10 (63)، 45-31.
12.  مهندسین مشاور آب خاک تهران، (1393).گزارش بیلان منابع آب محدوده مطالعاتی رامسر- چالوس (کد 1402). دفتر مطالعات پایه منابع آب، شرکت مدیریت منابع آب ایران.
13.  مغزز، س، روستایی، ش، رحیم پور؛ ت .(1398). پهنه بندی خطر زمین لغزش در حوضه آبخیز نهند چای با استفاده از مدل ANP و تکنیک GIS ، پژوهش های ژئومورفولوژی کمی، 8 (2)، 23 -37.
14.     -Abedini, M., Beheshti, javad. E., Fathi, M. H.(2015). Landslide risk sensitivity zoning with two- Variable Statistical models and fuzzy logic (Cass study: Balkhio River Environometal planning, 26, 59, No.3, pp.43-60 [In Persian].
15.   -Abedini, M., Rousthi, Shahram. Fathi, M.H.n,(2016). Landsilde Sensitivity zoning using Bayes theorem-ANP hybrid model. The south bank of Ahar chai Lez Watershed from Nasir Kandi Quantitative Geomorphology Research, 5th year, No. 1, pp.149-159. [In Persian].
16.   -Althuwaynee, O.F., Pradhan, B., Lee, S., (2013). Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput. Geosci. 44, 120–135.
17.    -Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H., 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65, 15–31.
18.   -Boroumandi M, Khamechiyan M, Nikoudel M.R. (2009) Using of Analytic Hierarchy Process for landslide hazard zonation in Zanjan Province, 6th Iranian Conference of Engineering Geology and Environment, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran. 2009, (Paper ID: 67).
19.    -Burns, S.F., 2006. Landslides in Practice: Investigation, Analysis and Remedial/Preventative Options in Soils.
20.   -Amir ahmadi,A.,Shekari Badi, A. and Motamedi Rad, M. 2014 Landslide risk Zoning using the ANP   model(Case Study: Pyogen Basin- South Binalud Ramge), Quantitative Geomorphology Research, year 4, Number3, pp.214-330. [In Persian].
21.    -Bin , Y .Yu, M And Yafa , W. . (2013) , Case Stady Of A giant Debris Fiow In The WenjiGully,                  Sichuan Province , China , Nat Hazards . vol . 65. Pp. 835- 849.
22.    -Cevik, E., Topal, T., 2003. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline, Hendek (Turkey). Environ. Geol. 44, 949–962.
23.    -Chacón, J., Irigaray, C., Fernández, T., (1994). Large to middle-scale landslides inventory, analysis and mapping with modeling and assessment of derived susceptibility, hazards and risks in a GIS, in: Proceedings of 7th IAEG Congress, Balkema, Rotterdam. pp. 4669–4678.
24.    -Chen, W., Li, W., Chai, H., Hou, E., Li, X., Ding, X., 2016. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and certainty factor (CF) models for the Baozhong region of Baoji City, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 75, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s12665-015-4795-7.
25.    -Çimren, E., Çatay, B., Budak, E., 2007. Development of a machine tool selection system using AHP. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 35, 363–376. doi:10.1007/s00170-006-0714-0.
26.    -Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F., Li, Jx., Xu, Z.W.,(2001). Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ. Geol. 40, 381–391. 
27.   -Ercanoglu, M., Gokceoglu, C.,(2002). Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach. Environ. Geol. 41.
28.   -Feizizadeh, B., Jankowski, P., Blaschke, T.,(2014). A GIS based spatially-explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis approach for multi-criteria decision analysis. Comput. Geosci. 64, 81–95. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2013.11.009.
29.    Faraji Sabokbar, H., Salmani, M., Faridouni, F., Karimzadeh, H., and Rahimi, H., 2009. Location Of Sanitary landfill of rural Waste using ANP network analaysis model; case Study; raral areas of QOCHAN CITY, humanities lecturer chapter, volome 14, number 1, pp. 127-149.(persian).
30.    Hadmoko, D.S., Lavigne, F., Samodra, G., (2017). Application of a semiquantitative and GIS-based statistical model to landslide susceptibility zonation in Kayangan Catchment, Java, Indonesia. Nat. Hazards 87, 437–468. doi:10.1007/s11069-017-2772-z.
31.   -Komac, M., 2006. A landslide susceptibility model using the analytical hierarchy process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia. Geomorphology 74, 17–28.
32.    -Khajvand, Reza. (2014). Geotechnical and environmental Study of landslide Wwst of Ghat Kash vhiiage, Kejur Nowshahr region, Enviromental Geology Research Quatertly9 (33). [In Persian].
33.    -Karam, A., 1383. Application of Weighted linear combination model in landslide zoning (case study: Serkhon Chahar Mahal Bakhtiari region), Journol of Geography and Development, volume 2, umber 4, pp. 131-136. [In Persian].
34.    -Moreiras, S.M.,( 2004). Landslide incidence zonation in the Rio Mendoza valley, Mendoza province, Argentina. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 29, 255–266.
35.   -motevali, Sadruddin, 1396. Landslide zoning in Abkhiz Khanian Tonekabon Watershed using Winf informatian value model, Natural Geography Quartery 10(63):pp. 21-45.
36.   -Mahmoudi, F.,( 2008), Dynamic Geomorphology, Second Edition, Payam noor Publications. [In Persian].
37.   -Mozhez, Somayeh, Rostahi, shahram, Rahimpour; Oneess.( 1398). LanndSlide risk Zoning in Nahand chai Abkaz Basin using ANP Model  and Gis technique, Quantitative Geomorphology, 8th  year, umber2, pp.23-37.( In persian).
38.    -Nefeslioglu, H.A., Sezer, E.A., Gokceoglu, C., Ayas, Z., (2013).. A modified analytical hierarchy process (M-AHP) approach for decision support systems in natural hazard assessments. Comput. Geosci. 59, 1–8.
39.   -Nilsen, T.H., 1979. Relative slope stability and land-use planning in the San Francisco Bay region, California. US Govt. Print. Off.
40.   -Qanawati, Ezzatullah,( 2013). Zoning of 6 Lands in Jajroud basin of Tehran Province using hierarchical analaysis model, journal of Applied Research, Geographical Sciences, No. 20. Pp.51-68. [In Persian].
41.   -Rossi ,M., Guzztti , F., Salvati ,P., Donnini,M.,C ., Napolitano , E., and Bianchi, C.,( 2019) .A  Predictive model of Societal Landslide risk in Italy , Earth -Science Reviews, 196, pp. 1-19.
42.   -Rahimpour, Tawheed; rural; SHARAM; Arvin roohi, mahsa ;( 2023).Landslide risk zoning using AHP hierarchical analysis process in GIS environmental (case study; Sardol chai Watershed Ardabil province) Hydrogeomorphology, No. 13 Winter 2016, pp. 1-20. [In persian]..
43.   -Shirani, koresh, Arab Ameri, Alireza(2014), Landslide Risk Zoning Using Logistic Regression Model (case Stady : upper Dez Basin) journal of Agricultral Sciences and Techniqural and Natural Resources, Water and Soil Sciences, 19th  year , no Seventy- two, pp. 321-334.(persian).
44.   -Saaty, T., 1991. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 74, 426–447.
45.    -Saaty, T.L., (2005).  Rank from comparisons and from ratings   in the   analytic hierarchy/network processes. Eur.  J. Oper. Res. 168, 557–570.
46.   -Tehran Water and Soil Consulting Engineers, 2014, Water Resources Balance Report of Ramsar- chalus Study Area Code (1402), Water Resources Basic Studies Office iran Water Resources Management Company.
47.    -Yalcin, A., (2008). GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 72, 1–12.