مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

استفاده از فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی برای بهبود ارزیابی تناسب اراضی در روش آبیاری قطره‌ای

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
استاد گروه آموزشی مهندسی آب، دانشکده علوم و فناوری کشاورزی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
10.22034/jess.2023.415421.2122
چکیده
Today, there is a need to use new evaluation strategies to evaluate irrigation methods to improve the performance of water use in agriculture. In this study, the Fuzzy Analysis Hierarchy Process (FAHP) has been studied to check the qualitative suitability of the soil in drip irrigation and compared with conventional parametric approaches. The assessment based on the parametric approach identified areas with an area of approximately 2,941 ha (57%) as "very suitable (S1)". This method assigned an area of about 247 ha (5%) of the areas to "somewhat suitable (S2)" and about 798 ha (15%) to "almost suitable (S3)". Also, "permanently unsuitable (N2)" areas were about 452 hectares (9%), and "unsuitable in current conditions (N1)" areas were estimated to be about 737 hectares (14%). According to the Fuzzy Analysis Hierarchy Process (FAHP), suitability (S1) covers an area of about 2873 hectares (56%) and parts with suitability (S2) also covers an area of about 2100 hectares (41%) and an area of about 130 hectares (3 %) were assigned to "almost fair (S3)" quality areas. The results showed that some of the southwestern and western parts of the plain are in "unsuitable current conditions (N1)", which included an area of about 72 hectares (1%). Also, according to the FAHP method, there was no "permanently unsuitable (N2)" quality in the area. As a result, there was no significant difference between the two methods in terms of "very suitable land", but in the case of areas with evaluation (S2), the difference between the two methods was large, and the FAHP method allocated more area to these areas. Therefore, it should be considered that in FAHP assessment, taking into account gradual changes in soil properties, such as nature, it can provide more accuracy than traditional parametric methods for assessing soil suitability.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Improve Land Suitability Assessment in Trickle Irrigation Method

نویسنده English

yaser Hoseini
Professor, Department of Water Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
چکیده English

Today, considering the limitation of water resources and the growing population, countries around the world have been driven to increase agricultural production per unit area and maximize the use of these resources, and the growth of the population and the increase in living standards have increased the demand for food. In this regard, it is important to identify and understand the parameters that have an effect on agricultural production. In this regard, the optimal use of water and soil is one of the most important factors, so knowing the potential of agricultural land and supplying the water they need is one of the most important factors for increasing production. For these reasons, planners are encouraged to use the fuzzy analysis hierarchy process tool in combination with GIS to integrate and process different factors (Albaji et al., 2015; Turkish Statistical Institute, 2018; Hoseini, 2019) . These methods have provided a structured and explicit assessment framework (Karimi et al., 2018) and facilitated judgments based on soil characteristics regarding agricultural land use management practices (Roy et al., 2018). Lu et al. (2009) investigated the land and soil characteristics of 972 hectares of the Black Sea region of Turkey and prepared a land suitability map for surface and sprinkler irrigation methods for Charsamba Delta. The results showed that the fuzzy method for land evaluation is more flexible and sensitive, and this method reflected the real conditions of the region more accurately than the parametric method. Determining the suitability of land for irrigation requires evaluating the properties and topography of agricultural land. Therefore, for the optimal use of water and soil resources, methods that more accurately consider the suitability of the land for the type of irrigation should be used. In recent years, fuzzy inference structures have been used in many sciences. These methods take advantage of the linguistic power of fuzzy structures and this method can be used to research very complex processes. Fuzzy methods are one of the effective methods in the field of forecasting and modeling (Akbarzadeh et al., 2009). According to reports, fuzzy methods also use language and human experience (Karatalopoulos, 2000). Sys et al. (1991) proposed a parametric grading technique for land grading based primarily on soil properties. Based on this technique, the measurable characteristics of soil suitability for irrigation are divided into four. Miháliková and Dengiz (2019) used parametric evaluation to compare drip and rain irrigation methods in a farm in the south of Ankara. In this study, using geographic information system (GIS), soil physical properties, topography, salinity, alkalinity, and drainage capacity were analyzed and relevant maps were presented. The results showed that 31% of the lands in the study area are suitable for sprinkler irrigation and 51% of the lands are suitable for drip irrigation. The results showed that sprinkler irrigation is better than drip irrigation in more than half of the areas. Studies have shown that the use of GIS in parametric evaluation can provide special benefits for easier selection of irrigation methods, saving data analysis time (Hoseini and Delavari, 2015). Naseri et al. (2009) studied the parametric method in Lari plain and considered six factors including soil texture, lime, soil depth, salinity, slope and drainage. Their findings showed that 1732 hectares (48.5%) of the land surface were suitable for all three types of irrigation methods (drip, sprinkler and surface) and 384 hectares (10.8%) of the land were unsuitable for drip irrigation only. Calderon et al. (2005) studied the qualitative assessment of soil suitability for surface and drip irrigation in Shuang County, China. They used the parametric method of Sys et al. (1991) and GIS software to prepare land suitability maps for surface and drip irrigation. benefited The results showed that increasing the land slope with decreasing soil depth and increasing soil sand percentage is one of the limiting factors of irrigation in the region. The studied area, which has an area of 5175 hectares, is a part of Oltan plain, about 35 km southwest of Mughan city and 225 km northwest of Ardabil province. The geographical coordinates of the region are 47° 35' 57" to 47° 43' 22" east longitude and 39° 25' 13" to 39° 28' 27" north latitude and Fath-Ali village in the north of Ardabil province. It is located in the northwest of Iran. The height of the land above the sea level in this area is 158-254 meters, the average annual rainfall is 284 mm and the average annual temperature is fortheen degrees Celsius. The studied area is classified as a temperate climate based on the Emberger method and as a semi-arid climate based on the De Martonne method (Hosseini, 2019). Also, the moisture regime of semi-arid soil is dry subtype (Hosseini and Kamrani, 2017, Albaji & Hamadi, 2017). Figure 1 shows the location of Fath-Ali pressure irrigation network. In this article, the data collected from twenty stations, taken from the soil studies of the region, have been used (Hosseini, 2018). Also, according to the characteristics of the soil and the profile of land units, soil series were identified. To measure the physical parameters, intact samples were taken from different soil depths and the required parameters were determined in the laboratory.
Today, there is a need to use new evaluation strategies to evaluate irrigation methods to improve the performance of water use in agriculture. In this study, the Fuzzy Analysis Hierarchy Process (FAHP) has been studied to check the qualitative suitability of the soil in drip irrigation and compared with conventional parametric approaches. The assessment based on the parametric approach identified areas with an area of approximately 2,941 ha (57%) as "very suitable (S1)". This method assigned an area of about 247 ha (5%) of the areas to "somewhat suitable (S2)" and about 798 ha (15%) to "almost suitable (S3)". Also, "permanently unsuitable (N2)" areas were about 452 hectares (9%), and "unsuitable in current conditions (N1)" areas were estimated to be about 737 hectares (14%). According to the Fuzzy Analysis Hierarchy Process (FAHP), suitability (S1) covers an area of about 2873 hectares (56%) and parts with suitability (S2) also covers an area of about 2100 hectares (41%) and an area of about 130 hectares (3 %) were assigned to "almost fair (S3)" quality areas. The results showed that some of the southwestern and western parts of the plain are in "unsuitable current conditions (N1)", which included an area of about 72 hectares (1%). Also, according to the FAHP method, there was no "permanently unsuitable (N2)" quality in the area. As a result, there was no significant difference between the two methods in terms of "very suitable land", but in the case of areas with evaluation (S2), the difference between the two methods was large, and the FAHP method allocated more area to these areas. Therefore, it should be considered that in FAHP assessment, taking into account gradual changes in soil properties, such as nature, it can provide more accuracy than traditional parametric methods for assessing soil suitability. In this method, by using different weights of the indicators affecting the evaluation, the unusual influence of the factors on determining the final characteristics is reduced and the evaluation is closer to its real value.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchical Process
geographical information system (GIS)
land evaluation
parametric
trickle irrigation
1.       Akbarzadeh, A., Mehrjardi, R. T., Rouhipour, H., Gorji, M., Rahimi. H. G. 2009. Estimating of soil erosion covered with rolled erosion control systems using rainfall simulator (neuro-fuzzy and artificial neural network approaches). Journal of Applied Science Research, Vol.5 (5), P. 505-514.
2.       Albaji M, Hemadi J. 2011. Investigation of different irrigation systems based on the parametric evaluation approach on the Dasht Bozorg Plain, Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, Vol.66:3, P. 163-169
3.       Albaji M, Shahnazari A, Behzad M, Naseri A, Boroomand-Na sab S, Golabi M. 2010. Comparison of different irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach in Dosalegh plain: Iran. Agricultural Water Management, Vol.97, P. 1093–1098.
4.       Albaji, M., Golabi, M., Boroomand Nasab, S., Nazari Zadeh, F. 2015. Investigation of Surface, Sprinkler and Trickle Irrigation methods based on the parametric evaluation approach in Jaizan Plain. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, Vol.14(1), P. 1-10.
5.       Bagherzadeh A., Paymard P. 2015. Assessment of land capability for different irrigation systems by parametric and fuzzy approaches in the Mashhad Plain, northeast Iran. Soil & Water Research, Vol.10, P. 90-98.
6.       Burrough, P. A., McDonnell, R. 1998. “Principles of geographical information systems”. New York: Oxford University Press.pp.562
7.       Calderon, F., Fiorillo, E., Yan, N., Barberis, A., minelli, S. 2005. Land evaluation in the Shouyang county, Shanxi province, china. 25th course professional Master. 8 Nov 2004 - 23 Jun 2005. IAO. Florence. Italy.
8.       Elaalem, M. 2013. A comparison of parametric and fuzzy multi- criteria methods for evaluating land suitability for olive in Jeffara plain of Libya, APCBEE Procedia. Vol.5, P. 405-409.
9.       Feizizadeh, B., Blaschke, T. 2013. Land suitability analysis for Tabriz county, Iran: a multi-criteria evaluation approach using GIS, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 56(1), P. 1-23.
10.   Hamzeh, S., Mokarramb, M., Alavipanaha, S. K. 2014. Combination of fuzzy and AHP methods to assess land suitability for barley: Case study of semi-arid lands in the southwest of Iran. Desert. Vol. 19(2), P. 173-181.
11.   Hoseini, Y. 2019. Use fuzzy interface systems to optimize land suitability evaluation for surface and trickle irrigation, Information Processing in Agriculture. Vol. 6(1), P. 11-19.
12.   Hoseını, Y. Delavarı, A. 2016. Comparing the Suitability of Two Methods (Surface and Drip) of Irrigation Based on a Parametric Evaluation System. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol. 26 (2), P. 152-160.
13.   Hoseini, Y., Kamrani, M. 2018. Using a fuzzy logic decision system to optimize the land suitability evaluation for a sprinkler irrigation method. Outlook on Agriculture, Vol. 47(4), P. 298-307.
14.   Houshyar, E., Smith, P., Mahmoodi-Eshkaftaki, M., Azadi, H. 2017. Sustainability of wheat production in Southwest Iran: A fuzzy-GIS based evaluation by ANFIS. Cogent Food & Agriculture, Vol.3(1), P. 2-18.
15.   Karatalopoulos, S. V. 2000. Understanding neural networks and fuzzy logic- basic concepts and applications. New-Delhi, India: Prentice Hall.pp302
16.   Karimi, F., Sultana, S., Shirzadi Babakan, A., Royall, D. 2018. Land suitability evaluationfor organic agriculture of wheat using GIS and multicriteria analysis. Applied Geography. Vol.4 (3), P. 326-342.
17.   Klein, L. 1999. Sensor and data fusion concepts and applications. Bellingham: SPIE optical engineering Press.pp.236
18.   Laffan, M., Rees, S. 2004. Site suitability for spray irrigation of storm water and log sprinkler wastewater in stage 1 and 2 at the soutwood processing complex, southern Tasmania. Technical Report, division of forest research and development, forestry Tasmania: Camdale.512-526.
19.   Lu, l., Shi, Zh., Yin, W., Zhu, D., Sai, N., Leung, Cai., Chong, Fa., Leia, l. 2009. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the Danjiangkou reservoir area, China. Ecological Modeling, Vol.220. P. 3439-3447.
20.   Miháliková, M., Dengiz, O. 2019. Towards more effective irrigation water usage by employing land suitability assessment for various irrigation techniques. Irrigation and Drainage, Vol. 68, P. 617-628.
21.   Mugiyo, H., Chimonyo, V.G.P., Sibanda, M., Kunz, R., Masemola, C.R., Modi, A.T., Mabhaudhi, T. 2021. Evaluation of Land Suitability Methods with Reference to Neglected and Underutilized Crop Species: A Scoping Review. Land. Pp.235
22.   Naseri, A. A., Rezania, A. R., Albaji, M. 2009. Investigation of soil quality for different irrigation systems in Lali Plain, Iran. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, Vol. 7(3&4), P. 955-960.
23.   Roy, J., Saha, S. 2018. Assessment of land suitability for the paddy cultivation using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): A study on Hinglo river basin, Eastern India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, Vol. 4(2), P. 601-618.
24.   Samini-Namin, F., Ghadi, A. A., Saki, F. 2022. A literature review of Multi Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) towards mining method selection (MMS). Resources Policy. Vol. 77(4), P. 10-26.
25.   Seyedmohammadi, J., Sarmadian, F., Jafarzadeh, A. A., Ghorbani, M. A., Shahbazi, F. 2018. Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models in cultivation priority planning for maize, rapeseed and soybean crops. Geoderma, Vol. 310, P. 178-190.
26.   Singha, C., Chandra Swain, K. 2016. Land suitability evaluation criteria for agricultural crop selection: A review. Agricultural Reviews, Vol.  37 (2), P. 125-132.
27.   Sys, C., Vanranst E., Debaveye, J. 1991. Land evaluation. Part I. Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations. International training center for post-graduate soil scientists, University Ghent. Retrieved from: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/223207. Pp.502
28.   Torrieri, F., Batà, A. 2017. Spatial multi-criteria decision support system and strategic environmental assessment: A case study. Buildings, Vol. 7(4), P. 96-99.
29.   Turkish statistical institute, agricultural statistics summary. 2018. Retrieved from:https://www.library.illinois.edu/ias/iri/turkish/turk_stat_inst. Pp.256
30.   Uyan, M. 2013. GIS-based solar farms site selection using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Karapinar region Konya. Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 28, P. 11-17.
31.   Zadeh, L. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information Control. Vol. 8, P. 338-353.
32.   Zare Naghadehi, M., Mikaeil, R., Ataei, M. 2009. The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, P. 8218-8226.
33.  الباجی، م.، لندی، الف.، مروج،ک.، برومندنسب، س.، 1385. ارزیابی تناسب اراضی برای زراعت آبی به دو روش آبیاری تحت فشار و سطحی برای محصولات عمده دشت شاوورخوزستان.پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه شهید چمران
34.  خاشعی سیوکی، ع.، قهرمان، ب.، کوچک‌زاده، م.،  1391. ارزیابی پتانسیل استحصال آب از آبخوان با استفاده از روش فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی فازی، مثال موردی: دشت نیشابور. مجله پژوهش آب ایران.
35.  رمزی، ر.، شهیدی، ع.، خاشعی، ع.، 1393. پتانسیل یابی آبیاری بارانی با استفاده از روش فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی فازی در استان خراسان جنوبی. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی مهندسی آبیاری و آب،  شماره 16، ص 11-1.
36.  کوره پزان دزفولی، ا.، 1387.اصول تئوری مجموعه های فازی و کاربردهای آن در مدل سازی مسائل مهندسی آب. ویرایش اول, چاپ دوم جهاد دانشگاهی واحد صنعتی امیرکبیر.
37.  متکان، ع.، شکیبا، ع.، حسین پور، ع.، عبادی، ع.  1388. تصمیم‌گیری قطعی و فازی در مکانیابی پارکینگ‌های عمومی طبقاتی، مجله علوم محیطی، علمی پژوهشی، سال 6، شماره 3، ص 21-10.
38.  میرزایی تختگاهی، ح.،  برومندنسب، س.، بهزاد، م.، قمرنیا، ه،. 1384 . پتانسیل‌یابی سیستم های آبیاری تحت فشار در مناطق مرکزی استان کرمانشاه. همایش ملی مدیریت شبکه های آبیاری و زهکشی، 11 اردیبهشت 1384 ، اهواز.