Journal of Environmental Science Studies

Journal of Environmental Science Studies

Investigating the effect of using vermicompost enriched with microorganisms on growth and resistance of tomato against root-knot nematode and Fusarium wilt

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Amin Radmard Titkanloo 1
Abdolhosein Taheri 2
seyed Esmaeil Razavi 2
1 Ph.D. Student, Faculty of Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
2 Educational Department of Plant protection. Faculty of Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran
10.22034/jess.2024.471264.2287
Abstract
Introduction
Controlling damages caused by pests and pathogens, especially soil-borne diseases related to tomato plants, has a significant role in improving the quantitative and qualitative performance of its production (Chen and Roberts, 2003; FAO, 2020). Fusarium wilt of tomato is known as one of the important diseases of this plant in fields and greenhouse conditions (Abdel-Monaim, 2012; Cha et al., 2019). Also, root-knot nematodes (including species of the genus Meloidogyne) are the most important plant parasitic nematodes from an economic point of view in the world. Biological control is one of the natural methods of controlling plant pathogens and reducing their damage to plants (Migunova and Sasanelli, 2021). Many bacteria and fungi are used to control pathogens in different plant species, which have different antagonistic potential against different pathogens (Siddiqui and Akhtar, 2008; Bai et al., 2018). Some biological products, such as vermicompost, are also used as alternative or complementary methods in the biocontrol of pathogens (Yatoo et al., 2021). these products can significantly reduce the pathogenicity levels of soil pathogens (Basco et al., 2017; Bisen and Singh, 2019).
The effect of biocontrol agents and fertilizer products, such as vermicompost, in improving the resistance of tomato plants to soil pathogens has been separately investigated in various studies. However, only some studies have evaluated the effects of the combined use of these agents. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of the combined use of biological inhibitors and vermicompost on the control of soil pathogens.
Controlling damages caused by pests and pathogens, especially soil-borne diseases related to tomato plants, has a significant role in improving the quantitative and qualitative performance of its production (Chen and Roberts, 2003; FAO, 2020). Fusarium wilt of tomato is known as one of the important diseases of this plant in fields and greenhouse conditions (Abdel-Monaim, 2012; Cha et al., 2019). Also, root-knot nematodes (including species of the genus Meloidogyne) are the most important plant parasitic nematodes from an economic point of view in the world. Biological control is one of the natural methods of controlling plant pathogens and reducing their damage to plants (Migunova and Sasanelli, 2021). Many bacteria and fungi are used to control pathogens in different plant species, which have different antagonistic potential against different pathogens (Siddiqui and Akhtar, 2008; Bai et al., 2018). Some biological products, such as vermicompost, are also used as alternative or complementary methods in the biocontrol of pathogens (Yatoo et al., 2021). these products can significantly reduce the pathogenicity levels of soil pathogens (Basco et al., 2017; Bisen and Singh, 2019).
The effect of biocontrol agents and fertilizer products, such as vermicompost, in improving the resistance of tomato plants to soil pathogens has been separately investigated in various studies. However, only some studies have evaluated the effects of the combined use of these agents. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of the combined use of biological inhibitors and vermicompost on the control of soil pathogens.
Materials and methods
The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of using vermicompost enriched with bacteria and fungi on growth parameters of tomato plants infected with root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) and Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum). Vermicompost applications were considered at control, optimum, and excessive levels. Biocontrol agents were mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus mosseae) (G.) and two antagonist bacteria (Bacillus subtilis (B.) and Pseudomonas putida (P.)). These biocontrol agents were used individually (B.; P.; G.), in binary combinations (B. & P.; B. & G.; P. & G.), and also in a ternary combination (B.P.G.) at different levels of vermicompost application. Growth parameters, including shoot wet and dry weights, root wet and dry weights, and chlorophyll index, were measured at the end of the experiments.
Results and discussion
The lowest values of wet and dry weights of aerial parts under the triple effects (P < 0.001) of vermicompost level, enrichment treatments, and pathogens belonged to the control condition, and the highest levels of these parameters were obtained with B. & G., and B.P.G treatments under application of vermicompost excessive level and with F. oxysporum. In each enrichment treatment, the values of these parameters were higher in enrichment with G. mosseae than B. subtilis, and P. putidae was at the next level. The optimum and excessive vermicompost treatments showed higher amounts of wet and dry weights of aerial parts compared to the control condition (no use of vermicompost).
The lowest values of wet and dry weights of aerial parts under the triple effects (P < 0.001) of vermicompost level, enrichment treatments, and pathogens belonged to the control condition, and the highest levels of these parameters were obtained with B. & G., and B.P.G treatments under application of vermicompost excessive level and with F. oxysporum. In each enrichment treatment, the values of these parameters were higher in enrichment with G. mosseae than B. subtilis, and P. putidae was at the next level. The optimum and excessive vermicompost treatments showed higher amounts of wet and dry weights of aerial parts compared to the control condition (no use of vermicompost).
The results of root wet and dry weight indicated that treatments with no use of vermicompost and without enrichment led to the lowest levels of these parameters for both pathogens. Vermicompost application at optimum and excessive levels resulted in higher wet and dry weights, especially for the treatments with G. mosseae enrichment (including G. mosseae, B. & G., P. & G., and B.P.G). The highest levels of these variables were obtained with the excessive vermicompost level and under the effect of F. oxysporum.
The lowest chlorophyll index score was obtained under the effect of both pathogens and its highest levels belonged to the F. oxysporum. Comparing the means for the interaction of vermicompost and enrichment indicated the highest chlorophyll index in B.P.G. enrichment treatment and the lowest index level was measured with the control condition (i.e., no use of vermicompost).
Conclusion
The findings of the present study showed that using biocontrol agents combined with vermicompost application can significantly improve the resistance of tomato plants against soil-borne diseases and lead to higher levels of root and aerial parts growth and better photosynthetic performance. This effect was much higher using the simultaneous application of all biocontrol treatments compared to their separate usage.
Keywords
Antagonist bacteria
Fusarium wilt
Mycorrhiza
Root-knot nematode
Vermicompost
1.Abdel-Monaim, M.F. 2012. Induced systemic resistance in tomato plants against Fusarium wilt disease. International Research Journal of Microbiology, Vol. 3, P. 14-23.
2.Agrios, G.N. 2005. Plant pathology. 4th Ed. Acaemic Press. India, 635.
3.Antil, S., et al. 2022. Potential of Bacillus altitudinis KMS-6 as a biocontrol agent of Meloidogyne javanica. Journal of Pest Science, P. 1-10.
4.Anwar, M., et al. 2005. Effect of organic manures and inorganic fertilizer on growth, herb and oil yield, nutrient accumulation, and oil quality of French basil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, Vol. 36, P. 1737-1746.
5.Arancon, N.Q., et al. 2002. Management of plant parasitic nematode populations by use of vermicomposts. In: Proceedings Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Pests and Diseases, Brighton, Britain. P. 705-716.
6.Arancon, N.Q., et al. 2004. Influences of vermicomposts on field strawberries: 1. Effects on growth and yields. Bioresource Technology, Vol. 93, P. 145-153.
7.Atiyeh, R.M., et al. 2000. Earthworm-processed organic wastes as components of horticultural potting media for growing marigold and vegetable seedlings. Compost Science & Utilization, Vol. 8, P. 215-223.
8.Atiyeh, R.M., et al. 2002. The influence of humic acids derived from earthworm-processed organic wastes on plant growth. Bioresource Technology, Vol. 84, P. 7-14.
9.Azarmi, R., et al. 2009. The effect of sheep-manure vermicompost on quantitative and qualitative properties of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in the greenhouse. African Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 8,
10.Bai, Y., et al. 2018. Plant behaviour under combined stress: tomato responses to combined salinity and pathogen stress. The Plant Journal, Vol. 93, P. 781-793.
11.Basco, M.J., et al. 2017. Biological management of Fusarium wilt of tomato using biofortified vermicompost. Mycosphere, Vol. 8, P. 467-483.
12.Bhattacharjee, P.B., et al., 2015. Field evaluation of vermicompost and selective bioinoculants for the improvement of health status of tomato plants, Journal of Biology and Earth Sciences, Vol. 5, P. 25-33.
13.Bisen, K., Singh, H.B., 2019. Enhancement of Antioxidants and Nutritional Quality of Tomato Inoculated with Agriculturally Importance Microorganisms (AIMs) Fortified Vermicompost. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, Vol. 12, P. 17-22.
14.Castaneda-Alvarez, C., Aballay, E., 2016. Rhizobacteria with nematicide aptitude: enzymes and compounds associated. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 32, P. 1-7.
15.Cha, J.Y., et al. 2016. Microbial and biochemical basis of a Fusarium wilt-suppressive soil. The ISME Journal, Vol. 10, P. 119-129.
16.Chanda, G.K., et al. 2011. The effect of vermicompost and other fertilizers on cultivation of tomato plants. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, Vol. 3, P. 42-45.
17.Chen, P., Roberts, P., 2003. Virulence in Meloidogyne hapla differentiated by resistance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Nematology, Vol. 5, P. 39-47.
18.Devran, Z., 2003. The screening of F2 plants for root-knot nematode resistance gene Mi
by PCR in tomato. Turkish Journal Agricultural, Vol. 28, P. 253-257.
19.FAO.2020. http://www.fao.org.
20.García‐Garrido, J.M., Ocampo, J.A., 2002. Regulation of the plant defence response in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 53, P. 1377-1386.
21.Gaur, A., Adholeya, A., 2004. Prospects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. Current Science, Vol. 86, P. 528-534.
22.Gupta, C.P., et al., 2001. Antibiosis-mediated necrotrophic effect of Pseudomonas GRC 2 against two fungal plant pathogens. Current Science, Vol. 81, P. 91-94.
23.Gutiérrez‐Boem, F.H., Thomas, G.W., 1998. Phosphorus nutrition affects wheat response to water deficit. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 90, P. 166-171.
24.Gutiérrez‐Boem, F.H., Thomas, G.W., 1998. Phosphorus nutrition affects wheat response to water deficit. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 90, P. 166-171.
25. Hao, Z., et al., 2005. Control of fusarium wilt of cucumber seedlings by inoculation with an arbuscular mycorrhical fungus. Journal of Plant Nutrition, Vol. 28, P. 1961-1974.
26.  Haruna, S.G., 2021. Effect of vermicomposts on vegetative growth and yield characters of tomato infected with fusarium wilt. ADAN Journal of Agriculture, Vol. 2, P. 90-103. 
27.Jamily, A.S., et al., 2018. Isolation of local Bacillus spp. from Afghanistan soils and their potential in suppressing the root-knot nematodes on tomato. Soil Microorganisms, Vol. 72, P. 39-49.
28.Jeffries, P., et al., 2003. The contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable maintenance of plant health and soil fertility. Biology and Fertility of Soils, Vol. 37, P. 1-16.
29.Jones, J.B., et al., 2014. Compendium of tomato diseases and pests. APS press.
30.Juber, K.S., et al., 2014. Evaluation of biocontrol agents and chemical inducers for managing vascular wilt of tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Evaluation, Vol. 4, P. 335-343.
31.Kale, R.D., Bano, K., 1986. Field trials with vermicompost. an organic fertilizer. In Proc. Of National Seminar on ‘Organic Waste Utilization by Vermicomposting’; GKVK Agricultural University, Bangalore, India.
32.Kalra, A., et al., 2010. Natural compounds enhancing growth and survival of rhizobial inoculants in vermicompost-based formulations. Biology and Fertility of Soils, Vol. 46, P. 521-524.
33.Karagiannidis, N., et al., 2002. Effect of Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahliae Kleb.) and mycorrhiza (Glomus mosseae) on root colonization, growth and nutrient uptake in tomato and eggplant seedlings. Scientia Horticulturae, Vol. 94, P. 145-156.
34.Lamberti, F., et al., 2000, September. Relationship between plant parasitic nematodes and Verticillium dahliae in olive. In IV International Symposium on Olive Growing 586, P. 749-752.
35.Liu, D., et al., 2019. Evaluation of vermicompost and extracts on tomato root-knot nematode. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, Vol. 48, P. 845-851.
36.Liu, J., et al., 2010. Biocontrol of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato and growth-promoting effect of bacteria isolated from recycled substrates of soilless crops. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, Vol. 49, P. 163-171.
37.Micginnis, M., et al., 2003. Organic fertilizer for basil transplant production. Acta Horticulturae, Vol. 491, P. 213-218.
38.Nasresfahani, M., Ahmadi, A. 2010. Principles and foundations of plant nematology. Publisher: Agricultural education and promotion, 336p. (in Persian)
39.Nielson, R.Á., 1965. Presence of plant growth substances in earthworms demonstrated by paper chromatography and the Went pea test. Nature, Vol. 208, P. 1113-1114.
40.Nimnoi, P., Ruanpanun, P., 2020. Suppression of root-knot nematode and plant growth promotion of chili (Capsicum flutescens L.) using co-inoculation of Streptomyces spp. Biological Control, Vol. 145, p.104244.
41.Notz, R., et al., 2001. Biotic factors affecting expression of the 2, 4-diacetylphloroglucinol biosynthesis gene phlA in Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strain CHA0 in the rhizosphere. Phytopathology, Vol. 91, P. 873-881.
42.Oka, Y., et al., 2000. New strategies for the control of plant‐parasitic nematodes. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science, Vol. 56, P. 983-988.
43.Pandey, A., et al., 2013. Effect of vermicompost and bio- control agents on growth and flowering of gladiolus. The Asian Journal of Horticultre, Vol. 8, P. 46-49.
44.Parthasarathi, K., et al., 2008. Influence of vermicompost on the physico-chemical and biological properties in different types of soil along with yield and quality of the pulse crop–blackgram. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, Vol. 5, P. 51-58.
45.Perry, R.N., et al., eds., 2009. Root-knot nematodes. CABI.
46.Peyvast, G., 2007. Vegetabele Production. 4thed, Daneshpazir Press, Rasht, 362 p. (in Persian)
47.Raaijmakers, J.M., et al., 1995. Utilization of heterologous siderophores and rhizosphere competence of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, Vol. 41, P. 126-135.
48.Rajik, M., et al., 2012. Biochemical basis of defense response in plant against Fusarium wilt through bio-agents as an inducers. African Journal of Agriculture Research, Vol. 7, P. 5849-5857.
49.Rostami, M., et al., 2014. Evaluation of the effects of earthworm Eisenia fetida-based products on the pathogenicity of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) infecting cucumber. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, Vol. 3, P. 1-8.
50.Selvaraj, A., 2011. Effect of vermicompost tea on the growth and yield of tomato plants and suppression of root knot nematode in the soil. M. Sc. Dissertation, University of California.
51.Serfoji, P., et al., 2010. Management of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on tomato cv Pusa Ruby. by using vermicompost, AM fungus, Glomus aggregatum and mycorrhiza helper bacterium, Bacillus coagulans. Journal of Agricultural Technology, Vol. 6, P. 37-45.
52.Siddiqui, Z.A., Akhtar, M.S., 2008. Effects of organic wastes, Glomus intraradices and Pseudomonas putida on the growth of tomato and on the reproduction of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Phytoparasitica, Vol. 36, P. 460-471.
53.Singh, K., 2009. Microbial and nutritional analysis of vermicompost, aerobic and anaerobic compost. Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
54.Singh, R., et al., 2008. Vermicompost substitution influences growth, physiological disorders, fruit yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99, P. 8507-8511.
55.Sinha, R.K., et al., 2009. Vermiculture biotechnology: the emerging cost-effective and sustainable technology of the 21st century for multiple uses from waste and land management to safe and sustained food production. Environmental Research Journal, Vol. 3, P. 41-110.
56.Sohrabi, F., et al., 2020. Investigating the effect of Glomus mosseae, Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma harzianum on plant growth and controlling Meloidogyne javanica in tomato. Indian Phytopathology, Vol. 73, P. 293-300.
57.Tian, H., Riggs, R.D., 2000. Effects of rhizobacteria on soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines. Journal of Nematology, Vol. 32, p.377.
58.Vijayabharathi, R., et al., 2015. Plant Growth-Promoting Microbes from Herbal Vermicompost. In: Egamberdieva, D., Shrivastava, S., Varma, A. (eds) Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Medicinal Plants. Soil Biology, vol 42. Springer.
59.Walia, R.K., et al., 2003. Textbook on Introductory Plant Namatology. Director, Directorate of Information and Publications of Agriculture.
60.Yatoo, A.M., et al., 2021. Sustainable management of diseases and pests in crops by vermicompost and vermicompost tea. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 41, p.7.
61.Yatoo, A.M., et al., 2024. Effect of macrophyte biomass-based vermicompost and vermicompost tea on plant growth, productivity, and biocontrol of Fusarium wilt disease in tomato. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, p.103320.
62.آهومنش، ع.، 1385. اصول مبارزه با بیماری­های گیاهی (چاپ چهارم)، مرکز نشر دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان.
63.پارسا، ن.، ویانی، ع.، ارزنلو، م.، علی اصغرزاده، ن.، 1396. ارزیابی مقاومت ارقام مختلف گوجه­فرنگی نسبت به بیماری پژمردگی فوزاریومی و مقایسه تاثیر قارچ مایکوریز Glomus versiforme، باکتری آنتاگونیست Bacillus methylotrophicus و قارچ کاربندازیم در کنترل بیماری. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تبریز.
64.حیدری سورشجانی، ف.، 1394. بررسی کاربرد تلفیقی ورمی­کمپوست و قارچ Trichoderma harzianum در گیاه گوجه­فرنگی در مهار نماتد ریشه­گرهی Meloidogyne javanica. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه شهرکرد.
65.خلیقی، س.، خداکرمیان، غ.،  تنها معافی، ز.، 1389. بازدارندگی سودوموناس­های فلورسنت علیه گالزایی نماتد Meloidogyne javanica  روی گوجه­فرنگی در شرایط گلخانه، آفات و بیماری­های گیاهی. سال 78، شماره 2، ص 177-198.
66.دشتی پور، س.، صاحبانی، ن.، امینیان، ح.، 1396. تاثیر کاربرد باکتری آنتاگونیست Bacillus subtilis وسالیسیلیک اسید در گیاه گوجه­فرنگی در برابر پژمردگی فوزاریومی و Meloidogyne javanica. پژوهش های کاربردی در گیاهپزشکی (دانش کشاورزی)، سال 6، شماره 4، ص 1-10.
67.صارمی، ح.، زند، ا.، 1382. قارچ­ها و کنترل بیولوژیک (آفات، بیمارگرها و علف­های هرز)، انتشارات دانشگاه زنجان.
68.علیخانی، ح.ع.، 1385. پرورش کرم­های مولد ورمی­کمپوست و کشاورزی پایدار، انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
69. فکرت، ف.، اعظمی ساردوئی، ذ.ا.، ملائی مقبلی، ا.، مقبلی هنزایی، ا.، 1396. اثر ورمی­کمپوست و Glomus versiform بر کنترل قارچ Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici در گیاه گوجه­فرنگی، کنترل بیولوژیک آفات و بیماری­های گیاهی، دوره6، شماره 2، ص 127-138.
70.قربانی، م.، روحانی، ح.، مهدی خانی، ع.، رضایی دانش، ی.، میرهاشمی، ا.، 1390. شناسایی قارچ‌های میکوریزا آربوسکولار همراه با گوجه‌فرنگی در استان خراسان رضوی و بررسی تأثیر آنها در القای مقاومت در برابر نماتد گره ریشه (Meloidogyne javanica). پایان نامه دکتری، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.
71.ملکی زیارتی، ح.، 1387. بررسی اهمیت قارچ Trichoderma harzianum  در کنترل بیولوژیک با عوامل بیماری­زایی گیاهی، مجله گیاهپزشک و غذا، شماره 2، ص 21-25.
Journal of Environmental Science Studies
Volume 10, Issue 1
Winter 2025
Pages 9902-9916