مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

بررسی فراهمی برخی عناصر پرمصرف و کم مصرف و ترسیب کربن در حضور انواع بیوچارها در یک خاک آهکی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ملایر، ملایر، ایران.
10.22034/jess.2024.469568.2278
چکیده
به منظور بررسی فراهمی عناصر پتاسیم، فسفر، آهن و روی و ترسیب کربن در حضور انواع بیوچارها، آزمایش فاکتوریل در سه تکرار انجام شد. بدین منظور از بیوچارها در 10 درصد وزنی استفاده گردید. تیمارهای آزمایش شامل خاک شاهد (CS)، خاک + بیوچار ضایعات انگور (GSB)، خاک + پوسته قهوه‌ای گردو (NSB) و خاک + بیوچار کود مرغی (PMB) بود. خاک‌ها به مدت دو ماه در دمای 3±25 درجه سلسیوس در رطویت 70 درصد ظرفیت مزرعه نگه‌داری شدند و در زمان‌های 5، 10، 30 و 60 روز از خاک‌ها نمونه‌برداری صورت گرفت و رهاسازی پتاسیم، فسفر، آهن، روی و ترسیب کربن در نمونه‌ها اندازه‌گیری شد. نتایج نشان داد که افزودن بیوچار GSB، NSB و PMB به ترتیب موجب افزایش 3/589، 6/55 و 2/493 درصدی پتاسیم و افزایش 6/28، 7/13 و 4/110 درصدی فسفر خاک در مقایسه با شاهد شدند. همچنین افزودن بیوچار GSB، NSB و PMB به ترتیب موجب افزایش 0/163، 7/6 و 5/19 درصدی آهن و افزایش 4/20، 0/36 و 5/55 درصدی روی خاک در مقایسه با شاهد گردیدند. تیمار NSB چیزی حدود 10 درصد از پتاسیم و 5/4 درصد از روی خود را طی 60 روز انکوباسیون آزاد کرد در حالی که این مقدار برای هر دو عنصر در دو تیمار GSB و PMB به طور میانگین 2 درصد بود. با توجه به انتشار آهن، کارآمدترین تیمار GSB و ناکارآمدترین تیمار PMB بود. بیشترین شاخص مخزن کربن (CPI) در طی انکوباسیون در تیمار NSB دیده شد. ترتیب شاخص CPI در تیمارهای مختلف به این صورت بود: NSB> PMB> GSB در تجزیه و تحلیل خوشه‌ای مشخص شد که تیمار NSB بیشترین تاثیر را بر فاکتورهای اندازه‌گیری شده داشت.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the availability of some macronutrient and micronutrient and carbon sequestration in the presence of various types of biochars in a calcareous soil

نویسنده English

Zahra Varasteh Khanlari
Department of Soil Science,, Faculty of Agriculture, Malayer University, Malayer. Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction

Every year, a large amount of agricultural waste is produced in the world, which can make an important contribution to the supply of soil organic matter. One of the effective ways to provide soil organic matter is to convert these wastes into compounds that, in addition to providing energy, also reduce the volume and weight of waste materials. These compounds, while increasing the efficiency of water consumption, do not endanger the health of the soil and the environment. One of these compounds is biochar. Biochar is a product of thermal chemical combustion and carbonization of organic biomass, which is usually produced through pyrolysis of biomass at different temperatures under low oxygen conditions. Biochar decomposition rate is much lower than other organic materials and it can remain in the soil for hundreds to thousands of years. Biochar has a high capacity in reducing greenhouse gases and can store carbon in the soil for a long time. Biochars have attracted the attention of researchers in order to increase soil carbon (C) storage, increase crop yield, improve physical, chemical and biological properties of soil and accelerate the cycle of soil nutrients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the release of some essential nutrients from different biochars and carbon sequestration.

Materials and methods
This research was conducted in order to investigate the release of some nutrients from different biochars and carbon sequestration. For this purpose, a composite soil sample was prepared from Malayer city located in Hamadan province. The soil sample was transferred to the laboratory and after being air-dried, it was passed through a 2 mm sieve. Some physical and chemical characteristics were measured in the soil sample with usual laboratory methods. The biomass used to prepare biochar was grape waste, brown walnut shell and poultry manure, which grape waste was obtained from the vineyards of Melayer city, brown walnut shell from Tuysarkan city and poultry manure from Bijar city, Kurdistan province. The biomass was sent to a knowledge-based company in Ahvaz, Khuzestan province to be converted into biochar. In this center, the biomass was converted into biochar at a temperature of 400 degrees Celsius in an environment with low oxygen for two hours. Some chemical characteristics of biochars were measured. To carry out this research, the ratio of 10 percent by weight of biochars was used. For this purpose, 10 grams of each biochar was added to 90 grams of soil. Also, the control soil was prepared in three replicates. The experimental treatments included soil + grape waste biochar (GSB), soil + brown walnut shell biochar (NSB), soil + poultry manure biochar (PMB) and control soil (CS). The samples were incubated for two months at a temperature of 25 ± 3. During this period, the humidity was maintained at 70% of the field capacity and soil samples were taken at 5, 10, 30 and 60 days to determine the release of phosphorus, potassium, iron and zinc elements and to calculate carbon sequestration.

Results and discussion
The results showed that the addition of biochar caused an increase in exchangeable potassium compared to the control. Potassium concentration from 243.6 mg kg-1 in control soil (average of all times), to 1679.3 mg kg-1 in GSB treatment, 1445.1 mg kg-1 in PMB treatment and 379.7 mg kg-1 reached in NSB treatment. The amount of exchangeable potassium in GSB treatment (on average 1.2-6.9 times) was higher than other treatments. As the incubation time increased, the exchangeable potassium concentration increased. NSB treatment released an average of 10% of its potassium during 60 days of incubation. The order of potassium release from the biochar treatment was as follows: NSB> PMB> GSB, regarding potassium release, NSB was the most efficient treatment and GSB was the least efficient. This study showed that the release of potassium from biochars was higher compared to other elements during the incubation time. By adding biochar to the soil, the absorbable phosphorus concentration increased compared to the control. So that the concentration of absorbable phosphorus from 157.4 mg kg-1 in control soil (time average) to 202.2, 179.0 and 1.329 mg kg-1 respectively in GSB treatment. NSB and PMB arrived. Phosphorus release percentage in PMB treatment was more than other treatments. However, compared to other elements, the release of phosphorus continued with a slower process. This indicates that biochars can release phosphorus to the soil for more than one cropping season. The order of phosphorus release from different treatments was as follows: PMB > NSB > GSB. By adding biochars, the absorbable iron concentration increased. But this increase in GSB treatment compared to other treatments was significant (average 2.6 times during incubation time). Iron concentration increased from 12.0 mg kg-1 (average of all times) to 31.6, 12.8 and 14.4 mg kg-1 in GSB, NSB and PMB treatments, respectively. The order of iron release from the treatments was as follows: GSB > NSB > PMB. By adding biochar, the concentration of zinc in the soil increased compared to the control. Zinc concentration increased from 8.1 mg kg-1 in control soil (average of all times) to 9.8, 11.1 and 12.7 mg kg-1 in GSB, NSB and PMB treatments, respectively. Regarding zinc release, NSB was the most effective treatment and PMB was the least effective. The release order was: NSB > GSB > PMB. The highest carbon pool index (CPI) during incubation was seen in NSB treatment which was about 30% more than GSB treatment and 18% more than PMB treatment. The order of CPI index in different treatments was as follows: NSB > PMB > GSB. In the cluster analysis, it was found that NSB treatment had the greatest effect on the measured factors.

Conclusion
Biochar is an environmentally friendly material and its use in the soil can lead to an increase in organic matter and the content of nutrients. The results of this research showed that the addition of biochar to the soil increased the macronutrient and micronutrient studied. It also increased carbon sequestration in the soil. But it is difficult for a specific biochar to act as a complete nutrient. Therefore, it can be stated that the biochars used have long-term agricultural value, and considering Iran's climate and the severe lack of organic matter, biochar can be recommended as a stable organic matter in the soil.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Release
Cluster analysis
Carbon pool index (CPI)
1.       حسن پور، الف.، شیروانی، م.، حاج عباسی، م.ع و مجیدی، م.م. 1401. تأثیر بیوچارهای اسیدی بر برخی ویژگی­های شیمیایی و قابلیت جذب عناصر غذایی خاک­های آهکی، نشریه علوم آب و خاک، سال بیست و ششم، شماره دوم، صفحات 39-59. 
2.       حقایقی سولک، الف.، جلیلی، ب و سالک گیلانی، س. 1403. با بررسی تاثیر کاربرد لجن فاضلاب و بیوچار آن بر برخی خصوصیات شیمیایی و فعالیت آنزیمی، مطالعات علوم محیط زیست، دوره 9، شماره 2، ص 8607-8625.
3.      کاظمی، ع.، وارسته خانلری، ز و ضرابی، م. 1402. بررسی رهاسازی عناصر نیتروژن، فسفر و پتاسیم از بیوچارهای مختلف و ارتباط آن­ها با شیمی سطح بیوچار، تحقیقات آب و خاک، دوره 54، شماره 9، ص 1286-1299.
4.      کرمی، ص.، لندی، الف.، عنایت ضمیر، ن و زلقی، ر. 1400. تأثیر بیوچارهای ذرت و نیشکر بر برخی خصوصیات بیولوژیکی خاک و ترسیب کربن، علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، دوره 23، شماره 5، ص 57-69.
5.      کریمی، الف.، معزی، ع.، چرم، م. و عنایتی ضمیر، ن.، 1399. تاثیر بیوچار باگاس نیشکر بر فراهمی عناصر غذایی و ویژگی­های زیستی یک خاک آهکی، تحقیقات کاربردی خاک، جلد شماره 1، ص 1-17.
6.      نجفی قیری، م.، 1394. تأثیر کاربرد بیوچارهای مختلف بر برخی ویژگی­های خاک و قابلیت جذب بعضی از عناصر غذایی در یک خاک آهکی، نشریه پژوهش­های خاک (علوم خاک و آب)، جلد 29، شماره. 3، ص 351-358.
 
7.       Angst, T.E., Sohi, S.P. 2013. Establishing release dynamics for plant nutrients from biochar. GCB Bioenergy. Vol. 5, P. 221-226.
8.       Bastida, F., et al. 2008. Application of fresh and composted organic wastes modifies structure, size and activity of soil microbial community under semiarid climate. Applied Soil Ecology. Vol. 40, p. 318–29.
9.       Calderَn F.J., et al. 2015. A comparison of corn (Zea mays L.) residue and its biochar on soil C and plant growth. PLOS ONE. Vol. 10, P. e0121006.
10.   Cheng, C.H., et al. 2008. Natural oxidation of black carbon in soils:Changes in molecular form and surface charge along a climosequence. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. Vol. 72, P.1598–610.
11.   Chintala, R., et al. 2014. Effect of biochar on chemical properties of acidic soil. Archives of agronomy and soil science. Vol. 60, P. 393-404.
12.   Demisie, W., et al. 2014. Effect of biochar on carbon fractions and enzyme activity of red soil. Catena. Vol. 121, P. 214–221.
13.   Ding, Y., et al. 2010. Evaluation of biochar effects on nitrogen retention and leaching in multi-layered soil columns. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. Vol. 213, P. 47–55.
14.   Du, Z.L., et al. 2017. Biochar addition drives soil aggregation and carbon sequestration in aggregate fractions from an intensive agricultural system. Journal of soils and sediments. Vol. 17, P. 581–589.
15.   Gee, C.W., Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle size analysis. In: A. Klute. (Ed), Methods of soil analysis. Part, Physical and mineralogical methods. American Society of Agronomy. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Vol. 5, P. 383-411.
16.   Gul, S., Whalen, J.K. 2016. Biochemical cycling of nitrogen and phosphorus in biochar-amended soils. Soil biology and biochemistry. Vol. 103, P. 1–15.
17.   Hartley, W., et al. 2016. Effects of three different biochars on aggregate stability, organic carbon mobility and micronutrient bioavailability. Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 181, P. 770–8.
18.   Havlin, J.L., et al. 2005. Soil fertility and fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
19.   Kameyama, K., et al. 2010. Estimation of net carbon sequestration potential with farmland application of bagasse charcoal: life cycle inventory analysis through a pilot sugarcane bagasse carbonization plant. Soil research. Vol. 48, P. 586–592.
20.   Karimi, A., et al. 2020. Application of biochar changed the status of nutrients and biological activity in a calcareous soil. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. Vol. 20, P. 450–10.
21.   Khadem, A., et al. 2021. The effects of biochar on soil nutrients status, microbial activity and carbon sequestration potential in two calcareous soils. Biochar, Vol. 3, P. 105-116.
22.   Leng, L.J., et al. 2020. Nitrogen containing functional groups of biochar: an overview. Bioresource technology reports.
23.   Li, H., et al. 2017. Mechanisms of metal sorption by biochars: biochar characteristics and modifications. Chemosphere. Vol. 178, P. 466–478.
24.   Lindsay, W.L., Norvell, W.A. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal. Vol. 42, P. 421-448.
25.   Lusiba, S., et al. 2017. Effect of biochar and phosphorus fertilizer application on soil fertility: soil physical and chemical properties. Archives of agronomy and soil science. Vol. 63, P. 477–490.
26.   Naeem, M.A., et al. 2018. Combined application of biochar with compost and fertilizer improves soil properties and grain yield of maize. Journal plant nutrition and soil science. Vol. 41, P.112–122.
27.   Najafi-Ghiri, M., et al. 2022. Investigation of biochars application on potassium forms and dynamics in a calcareous soil under different moisture conditions. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. Vol. 68, P. 325-339.
28.   Najafi-Ghiri, M., et al. 2013. Factors affecting micronutrient availability in calcareous soils of southern Iran. Arid Land Research and Management. Vol. 27, P. 203–15.
29.   Nelson, R.E. 1982. Carbonate and gypsum. In: page, A.L: Miller, R.H; and Keeney, D.R. Methods of soil analysis. Part2. Chemical and microbiological properties (2nd Ed). Agronomy monograph. Vol. 9, P. 181-196.
30.   Olsen, S.R., Sommers, L.E. 1982. Phosphorus. In: Miller, A.L., Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Chemical and mineralogical properties (2nd Ed). Agronomy series NO.9. Soil Science Society of American Journal. USA. P. 404-430.
31.   Ouyang, L., et al. 2014. Effects of amendment of different biochars on soil enzyme activities related to carbon mineralisation. Soil Research. Vol. 52, P. 706–716.
32.   Piash,, M.I., et al. 2021. Release of essential plant nutrients from manure and wood-based biochars. Geoderma. Vol. 397, P. 1-11.
33.   Pierzynski, G. M. 2000. Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments, residuals, and waters.
34.   Rasuli, F., et al. 2022. Effect of biochar on potassium fractions and plant-available P, Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu concentrations of calcareous soils. Arid Land Research and Management. Vol. 36, P. 1-26.
35.   Rowell, D.L. 1994. Soil Science: Methods and Applications. Longman Group, London.
36.   Singh, B., et al. 2017. Biochar: a guide to analytical methods. CSIRO Publishing. 320p.
37.   Song, D., et al. 2018. Responses of soil nutrients and microbial activities to additions of maize straw biochar and chemical fertilization in a calcareous soil. European journal of soil biology. Vol. 84, P. 1–10.
38.   Torres-Dorante, L.O., et al. 2005. Hydrolysis rates of inorganic polyphosphates in aqueous solution as well as in soils and effects on P availability. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. Vol. 168, P. 352-358.
39.   Windeatt, J.H., et al. 2014. Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment. Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 146, P.189–197.
40.   Yanardağ, I.H., et al. 2017. Native soil organic matter conditions the response of microbial communities to organic inputs with different stability. Geoderma. Vol. 295, P. 1–9.
41.   Zhang, M., et al. 2020. Two-year study of biochar: Achieving excellent capability of potassium supply via alter clay mineral composition and potassium-dissolving bacteria activity. The Science of the Total Environment. Vol. 717, P. 137286.
42.   Zhao, Y.H., et al. 2018. Release of nutrients and heavy metals from biochar-amended soil under environmentally relevant conditions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. Vol. 25, P. 2517–2527.
43.   Zhou, C., et al. 2020. Biochar addition to forest plantation soil enhances phosphorus availability and soil bacterial community diversity. Forest Ecology and Management. Vol. 455, P. 117635.