مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

محاسبه شاخص ترکیبی تغییر اقلیم در استان‌های ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت دانشگاه سمنان. سمنان. ایران
2 گروه آموزشی اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری دانشگاه سمنان
3 گروه آموزشی بیابان‌زدایی،دانشکده کویرشناسی، دانشگاه سمنان
10.22034/jess.2025.539114.2391
چکیده
تغییر اقلیم یکی از پدیده‌های محیط زیستی مهم در قرن حاضر است. ایران با واقع‌شدن در منطقه خشک و نیمه‌خشک جهان با افزایش دما و بحران آب روبه‌رو بوده که این مسئله باعث می‌شود تا کشور نسبت به اثرات تغییر اقلیم آسیب‌پذیر باشد. باتوجه‌به گسترش مطالعات مربوط به تغییر اقلیم و اثرات آن بر ابعاد متفاوت زندگی بشر خصوصاً بخش اقتصادی آن، به نظر می‌رسد جای یک شاخص نشان‌دهنده وضعیت تغییر اقلیم در مطالعات خالی است. در بیشتر مطالعات انجام شده برای بررسی پیامدهای این پدیده بر اقتصاد، در بیشتر مواقع تنها از متغیرهای دما و بارش استفاده می‌شود؛ اما این پدیده چندبعدی چیزی فراتر از تنها به‌سادگی تغییرات دما و بارش روزانه است. این مطالعه با توجه به ماهیت پیچیده تغییر اقلیم، یک شاخص ترکیبی از آن را در سطح استان‌های ایران در دوره زمانی 33ساله (1370-1402) معرفی و استخراج کرده و روند آن را مورد تحلیل و بررسی قرار می‌دهد. در این راستا از روش وزن‌دهی تحلیل مؤلفه‌های اصلی (PCA) بر مبنای 25 متغیر اصلی تغییر اقلیم که توسط سازمان هواشناسی جهانی معرفی شده، استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که روند تغییر اقلیم در بیشتر استان‌های کشور در دوره تحت بررسی بدتر شده که این وضعیت در استان‌های مناطق خشک و نیمه‌خشک از جمله فارس جدی‌تر است. لازم به ذکر است این شاخص ترکیبی می‌تواند به سیاست‌گذاری و پژوهش‌های بین‌رشته‌ای خصوصاً مطالعات بخش کشاورزی که آسیب‌پذیرترین بخش‌ اقتصادی نسبت به تغییر اقلیم است، کمک قابل‌توجهی کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Measurement of Climate Change Composite Index in Iran’s Provinces

نویسندگان English

Mahdis Motaghian Fard 1
Majid Maddah 2
Mohammad Rahimi 3
1 Faculty of Economic, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University. Semnan. Iran
2 Faculty of Economic, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University
3 Faculty of Desert Studies, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
چکیده English

Abstract:
Climate Change is one of the most important environmental phenomenon in the current century. Located in an arid and semi-arid region of the world, Iran has already faced a water crisis and increasing temperatures, so the country is vulnerable to the climate change impacts. Due to the development of climate change studies and it’s impacts on different aspects of human’s life especially the economic sector, it appears that the lack of an indicator reflecting the state of climate change is felt in this context. While in the field, most of studies focus on analyzing the effects of climate change on the economy using only temperature and precipitation variables, however this multidimensional phenomenon is more than merely daily temperature and precipitation changes. Due to the complex nature of climate change, the study introduces and develops a composite index for climate change in provinces of Iran for 33 years (1991-2023) and examines it’s trends. The study applies Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method for weighing based on 25 climate change indices from World Meteorological Organization. The results show that in the most provinces the composite index deteriorated over the study period and this situation is more concerning in arid and semi-arid provinces like Fars. It is worth pointing out that this composite index can be useful for interdisciplinary studies and policy making specially in agricultural sector studies which is the most susceptible economic sector.
Extended Abstract:
Introduction:
Iran is located in the Middle East, an arid and semi-arid region in the world. It has already faced a water crisis and increasing temperatures, so the country is unsafe from climate change and its impacts. While in the field of environmental and climate change studies, most of them focus on analyzing the effects of climate change on the economy using only two variables (temperature and precipitation), this study aims to take into account a wide range of climate change variables by using core indices of climate change in order to provide a more comprehensive and precise description of the situation. Due to the development of composite indicators in economics studies, the study introduces and develops a composite index for climate change trends in provinces of Iran for 33 years. This composite index can simplify the complexity of this phenomenon, and then we can more easily analyze, compare, and track the trend of this multi-dimensional concept. It is noteworthy to mention that this composite index can be useful for studies and policy making in an agricultural sector which is the most vulnerable economic sector.
Methodology:
The study estimated a composite climate change index for 23 provinces in Iran by using proper methods and 25 climate change core indices from 1991 to 2023. This comprehensive study covers a broad geographic region of the country. Since all indices do not have negative impacts as they increase, the study classifies indices into two groups. The first group contains 16 indices, and their increase is expected to be harmful and negatively impact the social and economic sectors. On the other hand, the second group contains 9 indices, and their increase is expected to be welcome and have positive impacts. Weighing is the most crucial step in the composite index process. There are different methods to assign weight to the indicators; each has advantages and disadvantages. Meanwhile, principal components analysis (PCA) is one of the most used methods, and it will also be applied in this study. This method is commonly employed, especially when a linear relationship between variables is assumed. It is selected in this study because principal component analysis (PCA) serves as an effective tool to reveal patterns of similarity and difference within the data. Once those patterns are identified, PCA facilitates to reduce the number of dimensions without losing important information in the original data.
Discussion:
As demonstrated both indices had unpleasant trends, especially in the last 20 years. This trend is worse in provinces located in arid and semi-arid regions of the country, but as we have seen in the results, all provinces will face the challenges of climate change, and none of them is safe. For index 1, high values and increasing trends are expected to be harmful. Province like Fars have more critical situations, which is expected to worsen without proper action. Index 2 will negatively affect different sectors of the country as it declines. Provinces in arid regions are on the frontline of the impacts of the changes in the second index. Bushehr has a critical condition from the perspective of the second index. However, this province has a share of more than 5 percent of Iran's GDP. This trend can decrease the province's GDP. It is worth mentioning that the indices' deterioration can negatively impact economic-social sectors.
Conclusion:
Creating a composite climate change index is crucial for decision-making and policy-making processes to consider environmental aspects. Instead of dealing with numerous individual indicators, policymakers will have a composite index that covers all dimensions of climate change, allowing them to address every aspect of this issue. This will help not to eliminate any dimensions of climate change phenomenon. Similar to other applied indices such as the Climate Vulnerability Index (CVI), which is widely used by many countries to analyze vulnerability at the regional level, this index offers a robust framework for evaluation. Built upon a comprehensive set of standardized ETCCDI climate indices and employing a two-dimensional approach that categorizes indicators into favorable and unfavorable components, the proposed index can function on a level comparable to or even exceeding that of traditional vulnerability indices, which often focus solely on socio-economic variables. Due to its emphasis on key standard climatic variables, this index enables long-term trend analysis across different geographic scales and can be integrated with social and economic indicators.
While the findings highlight the worsening of climatic conditions across most provinces, it is essential to distinguish between the study’s comprehensive analytical approach and the descriptive reporting of index values. The primary aim of this research is to establish a coherent, integrated framework for analyzing climate change at the national level. This purpose extends beyond regional assessments of index fluctuations and can serve as a basis for interdisciplinary applications in economic, social, and policy-making domains.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Composite Index
Climate Change
PCA
Iran&‌‌‌‌‌rsquo
s Provinces
1.       Abdi, Herve, Williams, Lynne J. (2010). Principal Component Analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101
2.       Ayyoob, K., Krishnadas, M., & Kaeel, C. (2013). Intra-regional disparities in agricultural development in Kerala. Agriculture Update, 8(1), 103-106. http://researchjournal.co.in/upload/assignments/8_103-106_1.pdf
3.       Balaganesh, G., Malhotra, R., Sendhil, R., Sirohi, S., Maiti, S., Ponnusamy, K., & Sharma, A. K. . (2020). Development of composite vulnerability index and district level mapping of climate change induced drought in Tamil Nadu, India. Ecological Indicators, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106197
4.       Edmonds, H. K., Lovell, J. E., Lovell, C.A.K. (2020). A new composite climate change vulnerability index. Ecological Indicators. 117: 106529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106529
5.       Fakher, Hossein Ali, Panahi, Mostafa, Emami, Karim, Peykarjou, Kambiz, Zeraatkish, Seyed Yaghoub. (2021). New Insights into Development of an Environmental-Economic Model Based on a Composite Environmental Quality Index: A Comparative Analysis of Economic Growth and Environmental Quality Trend. Environmental Energy and Economic Research. 5(3). https://doi.org/10.22097/eeer.2021.280746.1192
6.       Farajzadeh, Z., Ghorbanian, E., & Tarazkar, M. H. (2022). The shocks of climate change on economic growth in developing economies: Evidence from Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133687
7.       Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
8.       IMF. (2021). Fiscal Policies to Address Climate Change in Asia and the Pacific. Asia and Pacific Department Fiscal Affairs Department, International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513561394.087
9.       IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
10.   IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Chapter 4: Observed Climate Change). Cambridge University Press.  https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/chapter-4/
11.   Mansouri Danesvar, M. R., Ebrahimi, M.,Nejadsoleymani, H., (2019). An overview of climate change in Iran:facts and statistics.Environmental Systems Research.8(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-019-0135-3
12.   OECD. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators, Methodology and User Guide. OECD.
13.   Rana, V., Ram, S., Sedhil, R., Nehra, K., & Sharma, I. (2015). Physiological, Biochemical and Morphological Study in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) RILs Population for Salinity Tolerance. Journal of Agricultural Science, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n10p119
14.   Sendhil, R., Jha, A., Kumar, A., & Singh, S. (2018). Extent of vulnerability in wheat producing agro-ecologies of India: Tracking from indicators of cross-section and multi-dimension data. Ecological Indicators, 89, 771-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.053
15.  Wirehn, L., Daneilsson, A., Neset, T. S., (2015). Assesmanet of composite index methods for agricultural vulnerability to climate change. Journal of Environmental Management. 156. 70-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.020
16.  خاندوزی، سید احسان، مصطفوی ثانی، علی، سرآبادانی، حسین. (1398). طراحی و برآورد شاخص ترکیبی عدالت اجتماعی در ایران. مجلس و راهبرد. سال 27 (102). 5-41. https://sid.ir/paper/377722/fa
17.  دفتر طرح ملی تغییر آب‌وهوا. گزارش ملی تغییر اقلیم در ایران. سال‌های مختلف.
18.  سازمان حفاظت محیط‌زیست. گزارش وضعیت محیط‌زیست ایران. سال‌های مختلف.
19.  سازمان هواشناسی کشور. داده‌های آماری. داده‌های اقلیمی و تاریخچه‌ای.
20.  سالنامه مرکز خشکسالی و مدیریت بحران. 1397.
21.  صیادی، محمد، محمدخانی، میلاد، حافظی، حسین. (1402). برآورد و ارزیابی عملکرد اقتصادی-انرژی-محیط زیستی ایران با استفاده از شاخص ترکیبی 3EPI و مدل TVP. پژوهشنامه اقتصاد انرژی ایران، دوره 12 (46). 93-130. 10.22054/jiee.2023.73797.2011
22.  غفاری فرد، محمد، ملکی نصر، هاشم. (1398). سنجش فضایی اقتصاد دانش‌بنیان در استان‌های مختلف ایران (رویکرد شاخص ترکیبی). رهیافت. دوره 29 (75). 10.22034/rahyaft.2019.13790
23.  فریدزاد، علی، بانوئی، علی‌اصغر، گودرزی، مهسا. (1400). سنجش آسیب‌پذیری بخش‌های اقتصادی ایران ناشی از تحریم صادرات نفت خام: محاسبه یک شاخص ترکیبی مبتنی بر الگوی داده ستانده. فصلنامه نظریه‌های کاربردی اقتصاد. سال هشتم (2). 35-74. https://sid.ir/paper/1048748/fa
24.  مرادزاده, میلاد و پورحسین, هادی. (1403). ارزیابی اثر تغییر اقلیم بر خشکسالی (مطالعه موردی: بخشی از حوضه کارون). مطالعات علوم محیط زیست. سال 9 (4). 9415- 9405.  10.22034/jess.2024.435259.2212
25.  مرادی نژاد, امیر و خسروبیگی, سعید . (1403). ارزیابی تأثیر تغییر اقلیم بر پارامترهای دما و بارش منطقه اراک. مطالعات علوم محیط زیست. سال 9 (4). 9534-9524. 10.22034/jess.2024.458377.2258
26.  مرکز آمار ایران. سالنامه‌های آماری استان‌ها. سال‌های مختلف.
27.  میرجلیلی، سید حسین، آماده، حمید، متقیان‌فرد، مهدیس. (1398). اثر تغییر اقلیم بر رشد تولید ناخالص داخلی در 27 استان ایران (با استفاده از روش داده‌های پانل).  فصلنامه اقتصاد محیط‌زیست و منابع طبیعی، سال سوم (5). 152-127. 10.22054/eenr.2019.12479