مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

ارزیابی جامع شاخص‌های آلودگی در خاک‌های کشاورزی اطراف رودخانه زاینده رود در اصفهان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه مهندسی محیط زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهرکرد، شهرکرد
2 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مهندسی محیط زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهرکرد، شهرکرد
3 دانشیار گروه مهندسی صنایع مبلمان، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهرکرد، شهرکرد
10.22034/jess.2025.553403.2415
چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف بررسی غلظت فلزات‌سنگین روی، مس، کادمیوم، نیکل و سرب در خاک زمین‌های کشاورزی اطراف رودخانه زاینده‌رود در اصفهان انجام شد. منطقه مورد مطالعه شامل محدوده‌های کشاورزی همجوار رودخانه زاینده‌ رود در اصفهان و رسوبات رودخانه زاینده رود در محدوده دشت کوهپایه سجزی و گاوخونی است. نمونه برداری خاک حداقل از 108 نقطه از رسوبات رودخانه در منطقه پایین دست زمین‌های کشاورزی در محدوده دشت کوهپایه-سجزی-گاوخونی انجام گرفت. در این پژوهش به ارزیابی آلودگی خاک با استفاده از شاخص‌های آلودگی شامل: فاکتور غنی‌شدگی، شاخص زمین‌انباشتگی، فاکتورآلودگی و خطر اکولوژیکی پرداخته شد. میانگین شاخص ژئوشیمیایی برای پنج فلز 126/0 اندازه‌گیری شدکه در کلاس یک یعنی غیر آلوده قرار دارد. میانگین شاخص خطر اکولوژیکی برای پنج فلز اندازه‌گیری شده 925/13 محاسبه شد. که کمتر از 40 است و خطر اکولوژیکی کم را نشان می‌دهد. میانگین شاخص ضریب‌ آلودگی برای پنج فلز اندازه‌گیری شده 0235/2 محاسبه شد که ضریب‌آلودگی متوسط را نشان می‌دهد. میانگین شاخص ضریب غنی‌شدگی برای پنج فلز اندازه‌گیری شده 242/2 محاسبه شد. نتایج نشان داد که سطح آلودگی فلزات‌سنگین در خاک‌های کشاورزی در اطراف رودخانه در بیشتر موارد در اندازه‌ای نیست که نگرانی جدی ایجاد کند. ادامه پایش کیفیت خاک و همچنین ارزیابی اثرات زیست ‌محیطی فعالیت‌های کشاورزی و صنعتی در این منطقه برای حفظ محیط و سلامت خاک ضروری به نظر می‌رسد. این مطالعه می‌تواند به عنوان مبنایی برای تحقیقات آینده در زمینه مدیریت آلودگی خاک در نواحی کشاورزی عمل کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Comprehensive assessment of pollution indicators in agricultural soils around the Zayandeh Rood River in Isfahan

نویسندگان English

nasrin Gharahi 1
Mohammad Mehdi Fathian 2
Ali jafari 1
Mohsen Bahmani 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
2 Master's degree student, Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
3 Department of Natural Resources and Earth Science, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction

Heavy metals in soil are known as a very important pollutant and can be absorbed by plants and enter the food chain or by entering surface and underground water resources, they endanger the health and life of living organisms. Heavy metals are stable and accumulated in nature and if combined with organic and inorganic soil materials, they can enter the food chain. Then they penetrate the human body through food. Heavy metals can be absorbed into the human body through inhalation, skin contact, or direct ingestion. This study aimed to investigate the concentration of heavy metals in 108 soil samples from agricultural lands around the Zayandeh Rud River in Isfahan.

Materials and methods
The study area includes agricultural areas adjacent to the Zayandeh Rud River in Isfahan in the Sajzi and Gavkhoni foothill plains. Soil sampling was carried out from at least 108 points of river sediments in the downstream area of agricultural lands in the Sajzi-Gavkhoni-Kuhpayeh plains. The results of the experiment and comparison of the results of the element analysis were analyzed using Excel and SPSS software. One of the common methods for quantifying soil pollution is the use of environmental indices. In this study, soil pollution was evaluated using pollution indices including: enrichment factor, geoaccumulation index, pollution factor and ecological risk.
Results and discussion
The average geochemical index for 5 metals was measured as 0.126, which is in class 1, i.e. non-polluted. The average ecological risk index for 5 metals measured was calculated as 13.925. Which is less than 40 and indicates low ecological risk. The average pollution coefficient index for 5 metals measured was calculated as 2.0235. Which indicates medium pollution coefficient index. The average enrichment coefficient index for 5 metals measured was calculated as 2.242. The results showed that in all the samples studied, the level of heavy metal contamination in agricultural soils around the river is not in most cases of a serious concern. Except for the enrichment factor, which requires further measures and investigations. Continued monitoring of soil quality as well as assessment of the environmental impacts of agricultural and industrial activities in this area seems essential to preserve the ecosystem and soil health. This study can serve as a basis for future research in the field of soil contamination management in agricultural areas. Interpretation of the results of environmental indicators showed that continuous monitoring and monitoring of changes in the concentration of these elements in the studied soils is essential to preserve production resources and achieve food security.


Conclusion
Overall, the concerning nature of these results, coupled with the limitations of the data, suggests that neglecting other sources of pollution – such as contamination from organic matter and pesticides used in agriculture – could lead to further problems. Furthermore, the absence of severe heavy metal contamination should not result in neglecting optimal soil and water management in the region. Ultimately, although heavy metal contamination is not currently a major concern, continued monitoring and the promotion of sustainable agricultural practices remain essential to prevent future environmental issues.
Introduction

Heavy metals in soil are known as a very important pollutant and can be absorbed by plants and enter the food chain or by entering surface and underground water resources, they endanger the health and life of living organisms. Heavy metals are stable and accumulated in nature and if combined with organic and inorganic soil materials, they can enter the food chain. Then they penetrate the human body through food. Heavy metals can be absorbed into the human body through inhalation, skin contact, or direct ingestion. This study aimed to investigate the concentration of heavy metals in 108 soil samples from agricultural lands around the Zayandeh Rud River in Isfahan.

Materials and methods
The study area includes agricultural areas adjacent to the Zayandeh Rud River in Isfahan in the Sajzi and Gavkhoni foothill plains. Soil sampling was carried out from at least 108 points of river sediments in the downstream area of agricultural lands in the Sajzi-Gavkhoni-Kuhpayeh plains. The results of the experiment and comparison of the results of the element analysis were analyzed using Excel and SPSS software. One of the common methods for quantifying soil pollution is the use of environmental indices. In this study, soil pollution was evaluated using pollution indices including: enrichment factor, geoaccumulation index, pollution factor and ecological risk.
Results and discussion
The average geochemical index for 5 metals was measured as 0.126, which is in class 1, i.e. non-polluted. The average ecological risk index for 5 metals measured was calculated as 13.925. Which is less than 40 and indicates low ecological risk. The average pollution coefficient index for 5 metals measured was calculated as 2.0235. Which indicates medium pollution coefficient index. The average enrichment coefficient index for 5 metals measured was calculated as 2.242. The results showed that in all the samples studied, the level of heavy metal contamination in agricultural soils around the river is not in most cases of a serious concern. Except for the enrichment factor, which requires further measures and investigations. Continued monitoring of soil quality as well as assessment of the environmental impacts of agricultural and industrial activities in this area seems essential to preserve the ecosystem and soil health. This study can serve as a basis for future research in the field of soil contamination management in agricultural areas. Interpretation of the results of environmental indicators showed that continuous monitoring and monitoring of changes in the concentration of these elements in the studied soils is essential to preserve production resources and achieve food security.


Conclusion
Overall, the concerning nature of these results, coupled with the limitations of the data, suggests that neglecting other sources of pollution – such as contamination from organic matter and pesticides used in agriculture – could lead to further problems. Furthermore, the absence of severe heavy metal contamination should not result in neglecting optimal soil and water management in the region. Ultimately, although heavy metal contamination is not currently a major concern, continued monitoring and the promotion of sustainable agricultural practices remain essential to prevent future environmental issues.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Pollution
heavy metals
enrichment factor
ecological risk
pollution factor
1.       Adnan, M., Xiao, B., Xiao, P., Zhao, P., Li, R., and Bibi, S., 2022. Research Progress on Heavy Metals Pollution in the Soil of Smelting Sites in China. Science of the MDPI, 10 (231), 2-30.
2.       Al-Heydari, M. J., Hassan, F., Alkubaisey, A., and Douabul, A., 2010. The Geoaccumulation Index of Some Heavy Metals in Al-Hawizeh Marsh, Iraq. Journal of Chemistry, 7(1), 157-162.
3.       Azimzadeh, B., and Khademi, H., 2013. Estimating background concentrations for assessing the contamination of some heavy metals in surface soils of a part of Mazandaran province. Water and Soil, 27(3), 548-559. In Persian with English abstract
4.       Amini, M., Afyuni, M., and Khademi, H., 2006. Modeling the mass balance of Cd and Pb in agricultural lands of Isfahan. Journal of Sciences and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4, 77-89. In Persian with English abstract
5.       Bao, Z., Sha, J., Li, X., and Sodango, H. T., 2018. Review of the Spatial Distribution, Source and Extent of Heavy Metal Pollution of Soil in China: Impacts and Mitigation Approaches. Journal of Health and Pollution, 8 (17), 53-70.
6.       Barzin, M., Kheirabadi, H., and Afyuni, M., 2015. An Investigation into Pollution of Selected Heavy Metals of Surface Soils in Hamadan Province Using Pollution Index. Water and Soil Science, 19 (72), 69-80. In Persian with English abstract
7.       Brannon, J. M., and Patrick, W. H., 1987. Fixation, transformation, and mobilization in sediments. Environmental Science and Technology, 21(5), 450-459.
8.       Chen, W. Q., Shi, Y. L., Wu, S. L., and Zhu, Y. G., 2016. Anthropogenic arsenic cycles: A research framework and features. J. Clean. Prod, 139, 328-336.
9.       Dabiri, M., 2003. Environmental pollution (air-water-soil-sound). Etehad publication, pp. 300.
10.   Hakanson, L., 1980. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control: a sedimentological approach. Water Research, 14, 975-1001.
11.   Hernandez, L., Probst, A., Probst, J. L., and Ulrich, E., 2003. Heavy metal distribution in some French forest soils: evidence for atmospheric contamination. Science of the Total Environment, 312(1-3), 195-219.
12.   Igwe, J., and Abia, A. A., 2006. A bioseparation process for removing heavy metals from waste water using biosorbents. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5(11), 1167-1179.
13.   Kabata-Pendias, A., and Pendias, H., 2001. Trace elements in soils and plants, third ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York.
14.   Karimi, M., and Gassem pooshirazi, M. R., 2012. Geochemical Distribution and Pollution rate of heavy metals (Pb, Zn, Ni, Cr and As) in Kor River sediment (south of Marvdasht). Journal of Geotechnical Geology (Applied Geology), 8(2), 133-145. In Persian with English abstract
15.   Khodakarami, L., Soffianian, A., Mirghafari, N., Afyuni, M., and Golshahi, A., 2012. Concentration Zoning of Chromium, Cobalt and Nickel in the Soils of Three Sub-Basins of the Hamadan Province Using GIS Technology and the Geostatistics. Water and Soil Science, 15 (58), 243-254. In Persian with English abstract
16.   Kumar, P. N., Dushenkov, V., Motto, H., and Raskin, I., 1995. Phytoextraction: The use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils. Environmental Science and Technol., 29(5), 1232-1238.
17.   Liu, G., Yu, Y., Hou, J., Xue, W., Liu, X., Liu, Y., et al., 2014. An ecological risk assessment of heavy metal pollution of the agricultural ecosystem near a lead-acid battery factory. Ecological Indicators, 47, 210-218.
18.   Mousavi, S. M., Brodie, G., Payghamzadeh, K., Raiesi, T., and Srivastava, A. K., 2022. Lead Bioavailability in the Environment: Its Exposure and Effects. Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research, 10(1), 1-14. In Persian with English abstract
19.   Mousavi, S. M., Raiesi, T., Sedaghat, A., and Srivastava, A. K., 2024. Potentially Toxic Metals: Their Effects on the Soil-Human Health Continuum. Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research, 12(2), 86-101. In Persian with English abstract
20.   Nomas, A. H., and Al-Shamma, A., 2023. Water quality evaluation of the Main Drain in Dhi-Qar Governorate, south Iraq. Al-Qadisiyah Journal of Pure Science, 28(1), DOI: 10.29350/2411-3514.1016.
21.   Qin, G., Niu, Z., Yu, J., Li, Z., Ma, J., Xiang, P., 2021. Soil heavy metal pollution and food safety in China: effects, sources and removing technology. Chemosphere, 267, 129205.
22.   Rahmani, H., and Khan Mohammadi, Z., 2019. Investigation of the effect of Sepahan Cement Factory on heavy metal pollution in soils of Dizicheh region of Isfahan. Iranian Soil and Water Research, 51(7), 1701-1709. In Persian with English abstract
23.   Salminen, R., Batista, M., Bidovec, M., Demetriades, A., DeVivo, B., DeVos, W., Duris, M., and Tarvainen, T., 2005. FOREGS Geochemical Atlas of Europe, Part 1: Background Information, Geochemical Atlas of Europe Part 2 Interpretation of Geochemical Maps, Additional Tables, EuroGeoSurveys, pp. 525.
24.   Sarikhani, S., Ghassemi Dehnavi, A., Moradpour, A., and Amiri, M., 2017. Study of Soil Pollution with Heavy Metals from Leakage of Petroleum Hydrocarbons at Kermanshah Refinery. Journal of Environment and Water Engineering, 3(2), 157-169.
25.   Sherene, T., 2010. Mobility and transport of heavy metals in polluted soil environment. Biological Forum—An International Journal, 2(2), 112-121.
26.   Sun, C., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Sun, L., and Yu, H., 2013. Multivariate and geostatistical analyses of the spatial distribution and sources of heavy metals in agricultural soil in Dehui, Northeast China. Chemosphere, 92, 517–523.
27.   Taati, A., Salehi, M. H., Mohammadi, J., Mohajer, R., and Díez, S., 2020. Pollution assessment and spatial distribution of trace elements in soils of Arak industrial area, Iran: Implications for human health. Environmental Research, 187, 1-9.
28.   Wuana, R. A., and Okieimen, F. E., 2011. Heavy metals in contaminated soils: A review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. Journal of International Scholarly Research Network Ecology, 20, 402-647.
29.   Wieczorek, J., and Agnieszka, B., 2022. Pollution indices and biotests as useful tools for the evaluation of the degree of soil contamination by trace elements. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 22(2), 1-18.