مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

ارزیابی کیفیت محیط زیست در مدل رمزی با در نظر گرفتن اثرات جانبی زیست‌محیطی: مطالعه موردی ایران تحت سیاست‌های کلی محیط زیست

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده مدیریت و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه دریانوردی و علوم دریایی چابهار، چابهار، ایران
2 کارشناس ارشد اقتصاد محیط زیست، دانشکده مدیریت و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه دریانوردی و علوم دریایی چابهار، چابهار، ایران
10.22034/jess.2025.554558.2418
چکیده
نقش کیفیت محیط زیست به عنوان یک کالای عمومی در مدل‌های اقتصاد کلان پویا در طول دو دهه گذشته زمینه بسیاری از تحقیقات و مطالعات را به خود اختصاص داده‌ و دولت‌ها همواره به دنبال آن هستند که بتوانند با وضع مالیات‌های زیست‌محیطی بر آثار جانبی فعالیت‌های اقتصادی، اثرات مخرب این فعالیت‌ها را از بین برده و از تخریب محیط‌زیست جلوگیری کنند. در این میان، با توجه به تمرکز کم محققان به مدل‌های رمزی و توسعه این مدل‌ها و استفاده از این مدل‌ها برای اقتصادهای چون اقتصاد ایران که به عنوان یک محدودیت می‌باشد، این تحقیق با طراحی یک مدل‌ رمزی با شرایط خاص، به بررسی ویژگی‌های بلند مدت یک مدل تعادل عمومی تصادفی پویا برای یک اقتصاد رمزی با فرض نیروی کار درون‌زا در حضور اثرات جانبی زیست محیطی منفی برای اقتصاد ایران می‌پردازد. نتایج این تحقیق حاکی از آن است در یک مدل رمزی با وجود اثرات جانبی محیط زیستی، وضع مالیات را به عنوان یک سیاست به دنبال خواهد داشت که در اینجا مالیات بر سرمایه در بلند مدت وضع خواهد شد. علاوه بر این، درونزا بودن نیروی‌کار، منجر به ایجاد کانال ارتباطی بین مصرف و نیروی کار شده که جایگزینی بین مصرف و نیروی‌کار را ایجاد می‌نماید. اضافه بر این، انتخاب و جایگزینی مصرف بین دوره‌ای در این مدل، حاکی از جانشینی مصرف بین مصرف امروز و آینده است که این از دیگر نتایج این مدلسازی می‌باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Assessing Environmental Quality in a Ramsey Model with Environmental Externalities: The Case of Iran under General Environmental Policies

نویسندگان English

hamidreza izadi 1
mehdi hashemi 2
1 Associate Professor of Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Humanities, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar, Iran.
2 2. the Degree of Master of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Humanities, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar, Iran.
چکیده English

The role of environmental quality as a public good in dynamic macroeconomic models has been the subject of much research and study over the past two decades. Governments are always looking to reduce the effects of environmental taxes by imposing ecological taxes on the externalities of economic activities, so they can eliminate these destructive activities and prevent the destruction of the environment. Considering the low focus of researchers on Ramsey models and the development and use of these models for economies such as the Iranian economy, which is considered a limitation, this research, by designing a Ramsey model with special conditions, investigates the long-term characteristics of a general equilibrium model for a Ramsey economy with the assumption of endogenous labor in the presence of negative externalities for Iran's economy. The results indicate that in a Ramsey model, despite the environmental externalities, it will result in the imposition of taxes as a policy, where capital taxes are imposed in the long term. In addition, the endogeneity of labor has led to the creation of a communication channel between consumption and labor, which creates a substitute between consumption and labor. Furthermore, the choice and substitution of consumption between periods in this model indicate the substitution of consumption between present and future consumption, which is another result of this modeling.

The environmental quality as a public good has received significant attention in dynamic macroeconomic models over the past two decades. Governments aim to mitigate the adverse effects of economic activities by implementing environmental taxes, thereby preventing environmental degradation. Given the limited focus on Ramsey models in domestic research, this study designs a Ramsey model with specific conditions to examine the long-term characteristics of a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model for Iran’s economy, incorporating endogenous labor and negative environmental externalities. The findings suggest that capital taxation emerges as a long-term policy instrument. Moreover, labor endogeneity creates a substitution channel between consumption and labor, and intertemporal consumption choices reflect a trade-off between present and future consumption.
Introduction

Considering the role of environmental quality as a public good in dynamic macroeconomic models over the past two decades, many foreign studies have focused on this aspect. Governments, due to the importance of the environment, always seek to prevent environmental degradation by imposing taxes on environmentally harmful activities. On the other hand, increasing awareness about the environment puts more pressure on governments to reconsider their environmental policies. In the late 1960s, the issues of public policy regarding the environment began to be seriously discussed. Economists sought to design a theoretical framework that would allow them to depict new policy directions for this challenge.

Materials and methods
This research utilizes economic and environmental literature, and draws on studies by Angelopoulos et al. (2010), Xepapadeas (2005), Izadi (2023a, 2023b), Economides and Philippopoulos (2008), to introduce a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model with exogenous labor. It ranks various environmental policy tools under uncertainty, illustrating that governments impose taxes on polluting activities and subsequently use the revenues to finance activities that reduce pollution. This study also incorporates the research by Bovenberg and Smulder (1995) which examines the relationship between environmental quality and economic growth using an endogenous growth model that includes pollution-increasing technological changes.

Results and discussion
The presence of side effects in the model leads to changes in the results and creates a positive and constant (non-zero) capital tax in equilibrium. Additionally, endogenous labor has increased environmental awareness, causing households and agents to make employment and production decisions based on environmental quality. This results in the improvement of environmental quality following a positive shock introduced by households regarding the weight of environmental quality. Ultimately, based on the model's diagrams and impulse response functions, it can be concluded that both model assumptions are validated. Incorporating environmental side effects into the model leads to changes in tax rates, and environmental awareness and information also influence economic agents' decisions, thus confirming the model's two assumptions.

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Introduction

Considering the role of environmental quality as a public good in dynamic macroeconomic models over the past two decades, many foreign studies have focused on this aspect. Governments, due to the importance of the environment, always seek to prevent environmental degradation by imposing taxes on environmentally harmful activities. On the other hand, increasing awareness about the environment puts more pressure on governments to reconsider their environmental policies. In the late 1960s, the issues of public policy regarding the environment began to be seriously discussed. Economists sought to design a theoretical framework that would allow them to depict new policy directions for this challenge.

Materials and methods
This research utilizes economic and environmental literature, and draws on studies by Angelopoulos et al. (2010), Xepapadeas (2005), Izadi (2023a, 2023b), Economides and Philippopoulos (2008), to introduce a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model with exogenous labor. It ranks various environmental policy tools under uncertainty, illustrating that governments impose taxes on polluting activities and subsequently use the revenues to finance activities that reduce pollution. This study also incorporates the research by Bovenberg and Smulder (1995) which examines the relationship between environmental quality and economic growth using an endogenous growth model that includes pollution-increasing technological changes.

Results and discussion
The presence of side effects in the model leads to changes in the results and creates a positive and constant (non-zero) capital tax in equilibrium. Additionally, endogenous labor has increased environmental awareness, causing households and agents to make employment and production decisions based on environmental quality. This results in the improvement of environmental quality following a positive shock introduced by households regarding the weight of environmental quality. Ultimately, based on the model's diagrams and impulse response functions, it can be concluded that both model assumptions are validated. Incorporating environmental side effects into the model leads to changes in tax rates, and environmental awareness and information also influence economic agents' decisions, thus confirming the model's two assumptions.


Conclusion
Considering environmental policies and their role in reducing air pollution, as well as the findings of this research and the relationship between the environment and public health and welfare benefits, increasing green tax rates is very effective in preventing pollutant emissions. Therefore, the government should place more emphasis on approving and implementing green tax policies in society. Alongside this, they can also utilize tools such as regulations, fines, and financial incentives. Moreover, changing and improving energy consumption technologies toward environmentally friendly technologies will be highly effective. Reducing fossil fuels and replacing them with clean energy, such as wind and electric energy, are also other suitable and proposed solutions. A tax on fossil fuels will indirectly reduce air pollutants by decreasing fuel demand and consumption. Additionally, energy subsidy removal policies should be implemented. Implementing appropriate monetary and fiscal policies to control inflation and its effects in the country is crucial because higher inflation causes more people to leave their homes to earn income, leading to increased traffic and congestion, thereby exacerbating air pollution.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Ramsey Model
Taxation
Negative Externalities
Environmental Quality
1.       Adewuyi, A.O. (2016). Effects Of Public and Private Expenditures on Environmental Pollution: A Dynamic Heterogeneous Panel Data Analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 65, 489–506.
2.       Angelopoulos, K., Economides,G. & Philippopoulos, A. (2013). First-And Second-Best Allocations Under Economic and Environmental Uncertainty. Int Tax Public Finance, 20,360-380.
3.       Bovenberg, A. & Smulders, S. (1995). Environmental quality and pollution augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model, Journal of Public Economics, 57, 369-391.
4.       Chan, Y.T. (2020). Are Macroeconomic Policies Better in Curbing Air Pollution Than Environmental Policies? A DSGE Approach with Carbon-Dependent Fiscal and Monetary Policies, Energy Policy, 141,111-154.
5.       Cremer, H., Gahvari, F. & Ladoux, N. (2010). Environmental tax design with endogenous earning abilities (with applications to France), Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(1), 82-93.
6.       Dadgar, Y. (2013). Public Sector Economics. 3rd Edition, Qom, Mofid University. [In Persian]
7.       Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecol. Economy, 49(4), 431–455.
8.       Dubois, P., Griffith, R. & O'Connell, M. (2017). How well targeted are soda taxes, CEPR working paper DP12484.
9.       Economides, G. & Philippopoulos A. (2008). Growth Enhancing Policy Is the Means to Sustain the Environment, Review of Economic Dynamics, 11, 207-219.
10.   Eren, B.M., Taspinar, N. & Gokmenoglu, K.K. (2019). The Impact of Financial Development and Economic Growth on Renewable Energy Consumption: Empirical Analysis of India. Sci. Total Environ, 663, 189–197.
11.   Faraji Dizaji, S., Arefian, M. and Assari Arani, A. (2023). The Impact of Carbon Taxes and Fossil Fuels Subsidies on the Development of Renewable Energy in Selected OECD Countries. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQE), 19(4), 79-109. doi: 10.22055/jqe.2021.33321.2243. [in Persian]
12.   Fotis, P. & Polemis, M. (2018). Sustainable Development, Environmental Policy and Renewable Energy Use: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach. Sustain. Dev, 26(6), 726-740.
13.   Ghorbani, M.., & Firouz-Zar'eh, A. (2008). Introduction to Environmental Valuation, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press, Mashhad. [In Persian]
14.   Grossman, G.M. & Krueger, A.B. (1995). Economic Growth and The Environment”. Quarterly Journal of Economy, 110(2), 353–377.
15.   Haites, E. (2018). Carbon Taxes and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Systems: What Have We Learned? Clim. Pol, 18(8), 955-966.
16.   Heidari, H. & Katircioğlu, S.T. & Saeidpour, L. (2015). Economic Growth”, CO2 Emissions, And Energy Consumption in The Five ASEAN Countries. International Journal of Electr. Power Energy Syst, 64, 785–791.
17.   Izadi, H.R. (2023a). The Effect of Economic Fluctuations on Health Care Expenditures of Iranian Households Using the DSGE Model. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 33(1), 188-96.
18.   Izadi, H.R. (2023b). The Behavior of Households Using the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model: Alternative Models. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 57(1),1-8.
19.   Izadkhasti, H., Arabmazar, A. and Khajeh, A. (2019). The Analysis of the Effects of Environmental Tax Reform and Government Structure on Economic Growth and Welfare: A General Equilibrium Approach. Journal of Economic Research (Tahghighat- E- Eghtesadi), 54(4), 821-846. doi: 10.22059/jte.2019.264250.1007988. [in Persian]
20.   Jacobs, B. & De Mooij, R.A. (2015). Pigou meets Mirrlees: On the irrelevance of tax distortions for the second-best Pigouvian tax. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 71, 90-108.
21.   Jacobs, B. & Van Der Ploeg, F. (2019). Redistribution and pollution taxes with non-linear Engel curves. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 95, 198-226.
22.   Katircioglu, S. & Katircioglu, S. (2018). Testing The Role of Fiscal Policy in The Environmental Degradation: The Case of Turkey. Environ. Sci. Pollution Res, 25(6), 5616–5630.
23.   Kunz, F. & Weigt, H. (2014). Germany’s Nuclear Phase Out: A Survey of the Impact since 2011, IAEE Energy Forum.
24.   Manzoor D, Safakish M K. (2011). Impact of Environmental and Economic Policies on Urban Traffic Behavior Using Hybrid Top-Down Bottom-Up Approach: Case of Tehran. JEMR; 2 (4) :171-187. URL: Http://Jemr.Khu.Ac.Ir/Article-1-119-En.Html. [In Persian]
25.   Meade, J. E. (1952). External economies and diseconomies in a competitive situation. Economic Journal 62, 54-67.
26.   Pazhouyan, J., & Amin Rashti, N. (2007). The Green Taxes, With Emphasizes on Gasoline Consumption. Economic Research Review, 7(1 (24 Special Issue Tax)), 15-44. Sid. Https://Sid.Ir/Paper/67354/En. [In Persian]
27.   Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.
28.   Pigou, A. C. (1928). A Study in Public Finance. London: Macmillan.
29.   Pourghafar-Dastjerdi, J. (2014). Green Taxes (Environmental Taxes), Economic Journal, 1 and 2, 135-148. [In Persian]
30.   Rasmi, Javad, Abedi, Zahra, Panahi, Mostafa, & Mosavi Jahromi, Yegane. (2022). Investigating The Classification Process of Green Tax in Environmental Instruments, In Order to Achieve Sustainable Development. Journal Of Environmental Science and Technology, 24(9), 33-41. Https://Sid.Ir/Paper/1063663/En. [In Persian]
31.   Social Studies Help. (2024). Environmental policy instruments: Regulation, taxes & permits. Retrieved from.
32.   Stern, D.I. (2004). The Rise and Fall of The Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Dev, 32(8), 1419–1439.
33.   Stiglitz, J. E. (1987). Pareto efficient and optimal taxation and the new welfare eco-nomics. Handbook of Public Economics, edited by Auerbach, A. J. and Feldstein, M.,volume 2, chapter 15, 991-1042.
34.   Stiglitz. J. E. (2000). Economics Of the Public Sector. Norton & Company.
35.   Torki Harachgani, M. (2023). Simulation of Green Tax Effects on Health Indicators and Welfare in Iran: General Equilibrium Model of Economy, Energy and Environment (GEM-E3). J Tax Res; 31 (59): 28-48.URL: http://taxjournal.ir/article-1-2321-en.html. [in Persian]
36.   Turner, R. K., Pearce, D. W. & Bateman. L. (1993). Environmental Economics: An Elementary Introduction. Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.   Vahabzadeh Moghadam, M.S., Emami Jeze, K., Haji Hassani, F.( 2022). The Role of Economic and Environmental Policies on Preventing Air Pollution, Journal of Economic Modelling ,16(59), 1-17 . [in Persian]
38.   Xepapadeas, A. (2005). Economic Growth and The Environment, Handbook of Environmental Economics, Edited by Mäler, K. G. And Vincent, J. R., Volume 3, Chapter 23,1219-1271.