مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

بررسی فصلی کیفیت فیزیکی، شیمیایی و میکروبی آب رودخانه گرگانرود استان گلستان با استفاده از شاخص IRWQISC

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه اکولوژی، پژوهشکده اکولوژی دریای خزر، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران
2 گروه محیط زیست، مجتمع آموزش عالی گلستان، گرگان، ایران
3 گروه اکولوژی، پژوهشکده اکولوژی دریای خزر، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران.
10.22034/jess.2026.580538.2453
چکیده
این مطالعه با هدف بررسی فصلی کیفیت فیزیکی، شیمیایی و میکروبی آب رودخانه گرگانرود در استان گلستان با استفاده از شاخص کیفیت منابع آب سطحی ایران (Iran Water Quality Index for Surface Water Resources-Conventional Parameters; IRWQIsc) انجام شد. نمونه‌برداری از ۶ ایستگاه در چهار فصل سال ۱400 صورت گرفت و یازده پارامتر کیفی شامل pH، BOD، COD، اکسیژن محلول، هدایت الکتریکی، آمونیوم، نیترات، فسفات، سختی کل، کدورت و کلیفرم مدفوعی اندازه‌گیری گردید. نتایج نشان داد که محدوده شاخص IRWQIsc در ایستگاه‌های مختلف بین 15 تا 4/48 متغیر بود. ایستگاه مصب گرگانرود با مقدار 4/48 بهترین کیفیت (متوسط) و ایستگاه پل کمربندی آق‌قلا با مقدار 15 بدترین کیفیت (خیلی بد) را نشان دادند. بیشترین مقادیر BOD (۵۳ میلی‌گرم در لیتر)،COD (۲۴۵ میلی‌گرم در لیتر)، EC (۱۰۹۹۰ میکروزیمنس بر سانتیمتر) و کلیفرم مدفوعی (MPN/100 mL ۹۹۶) در ایستگاه‌های پایین‌دست ثبت گردید. نتایج نشان دادند که کیفیت آب رودخانه گرگانرود در وضعیت مطلوبی قرار ندارد و در طبقات «نسبتاً بد» تا «خیلی بد» ارزیابی می‌شود. ورود فاضلاب‌های شهری تصفیه‌نشده، پساب‌های صنعتی و رواناب‌های کشاورزی حاوی کودها و سموم شیمیایی مهم‌ترین عوامل کاهش کیفیت آب هستند. با توجه به نقش حیاتی این رودخانه در تأمین آب کشاورزی و تغذیه تالاب بین‌المللی خلیج گرگان، پایش مستمر کیفیت آب، احداث و بهره‌برداری صحیح از تصفیه‌خانه‌های فاضلاب شهری و صنعتی، بهینه‌سازی مصرف کودهای شیمیایی در بخش کشاورزی و ایجاد نوارهای حفاظتی در حاشیه رودخانه ضروری می‌باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Seasonal assessment of physical, chemical and microbial water quality of Gorganrud River using IRWQIsc index

نویسندگان English

Behzad Rahnama 1
Seyed Javad MirMohammad Hosseini 2
Mehdi Khoshnamvand 3
Hassan Nasrollahzadeh Saravi 1
Eisa Hajiradkouchak 1
Abdol Hamid Azari 1
1 Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
2 Golstan Institute of Higher Education, Gorgan, Iran
3 1. Department of Ecology, Caspian Sea Ecology Research Center, Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sari, Iran.
چکیده English

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Introduction
One of the main challenges in water quality management is the large volume of data from monitoring various physical, chemical, and microbial parameters. In this regard, the use of Water Quality Indices (WQI) as an efficient and simple tool has attracted the attention of researchers and responsible institutions. In response to the need for a localized index, the Iranian Department of Environment developed the national surface water quality index (Iran Water Quality Index for Surface Water Resources-Conventional Parameters; IRWQIsc) based on 11 key parameters. The Gorganrud River, with a length of about 300 km and a watershed area of 10,250 km², is one of the most important rivers in Golestan Province and the Caspian basin. Cultivation of various crops, high consumption of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, along with the discharge of urban and industrial wastewater, have imposed significant pollution pressure on this water resource. This study aimed to investigate the seasonal quality of Gorganrud River water using the IRWQIsc index, identify critical stations, and determine the most important parameters affecting water quality reduction.

Materials and methods
Six sampling stations were selected along the river to cover upstream (minimal pollution), midstream (affected by urban and agricultural pollutants), and downstream (accumulation of pollutants) areas: (1) Pol-e Shahr-e Kallaleh, (2) Gonbad (Pol-e Gedam Abad), (3) Voshm Gir Dam outlet, (4) Pol-e Kamarbandi-e Aqqala, (5) Pol-e Khajeh Nafas, and (6) Gorganrud Estuary. Eleven water quality parameters were measured: pH, BOD₅, COD, dissolved oxygen (DO), electrical conductivity (EC), ammonium (NH₄), nitrate (NO₃), phosphate (PO₄), total hardness, turbidity, and fecal coliforms. pH, temperature, EC, and DO. Fecal coliforms were determined by the multiple tube fermentation method (MPN) according to APHA. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. One-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's HSD post-hoc test was used to compare water quality indices among stations and seasons.

Results and discussion
The IRWQIsc values ranged from 15 to 48.4 across all stations and seasons. The Gorganrud Estuary showed the highest quality (48.4, "moderate"), while Pol-e Kamarbandi-e Aqqala showed the lowest (15, "very bad"). The highest BOD (53 mg/L), COD (245 mg/L), EC (10,990 µS/cm), and fecal coliforms (996 MPN/100mL) were recorded at downstream stations. Spring: IRWQIsc ranged from 15 to 47.5. Pol-e Kamarbandi-e Aqqala (15, "very bad") and Gorganrud Estuary (47.5, "moderate") represented the extremes. Summer: IRWQIsc ranged from 20.8 to 42.3. Most stations showed "relatively bad" quality. Water quality decreased compared to spring due to reduced river flow and increased pollutant concentrations. Autumn: IRWQIsc ranged from 27 to 46.6. Voshm Gir Dam outlet (27) and Pol-e Kamarbandi-e Aqqala (28.1) showed "bad" quality, while Pol-e Shahr-e Kallaleh (46.6) showed "moderate" quality. Winter: IRWQIsc ranged from 32.1 to 48.4. The Estuary showed the highest quality (48.4, "moderate"), and most stations were classified as "relatively bad". Water quality decreased from upstream to midstream, reaching its lowest point at Pol-e Kamarbandi-e Aqqala, then showed partial recovery at downstream stations. This pattern indicates significant pollution input from Gonbad-e Kavus and Aqqala cities, followed by natural self-purification processes.

Conclusion
The water quality of the Gorganrud River is unfavorable, classified as "relatively bad" to "very bad" in most stations and seasons. Pol-e Kamarbandi-e Aqqala was identified as the most critical pollution hotspot. Analysis of spatial variations showed that water quality decreased from upstream to downstream until Aqqala, then improved at downstream stations due to natural self-purification processes. Temporal variations demonstrated better quality in wet seasons (winter and spring) due to dilution effects, although increased erosion in winter can offset this benefit at some stations. Considering the vital role of this river in agricultural water supply and feeding the International Wetland of Gorgan Bay, urgent actions are recommended: continuous water quality monitoring, proper operation of wastewater treatment plants, optimization of chemical fertilizer use, establishment of riparian buffer zones, and public awareness raising. Future studies should measure heavy metals, pesticides, and persistent organic pollutants, and extend the monitoring period over several years.

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Introduction
One of the main challenges in water quality management is the large volume of data from monitoring various physical, chemical, and microbial parameters. In this regard, the use of Water Quality Indices (WQI) as an efficient and simple tool has attracted the attention of researchers and responsible institutions. In response to the need for a localized index, the Iranian Department of Environment developed the national surface water quality index (Iran Water Quality Index for Surface Water Resources-Conventional Parameters; IRWQIsc) based on 11 key parameters. The Gorganrud River, with a length of about 300 km and a watershed area of 10,250 km², is one of the most important rivers in Golestan Province and the Caspian basin. Cultivation of various crops, high consumption of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, along with the discharge of urban and industrial wastewater, have imposed significant pollution pressure on this water resource. This study aimed to investigate the seasonal quality of Gorganrud River water using the IRWQIsc index, identify critical stations, and determine the most important parameters affecting water quality reduction.

Materials and methods
Six sampling stations were selected along the river to cover upstream (minimal pollution), midstream (affected by urban and agricultural pollutants), and downstream (accumulation of pollutants) areas: (1) Pol-e Shahr-e Kallaleh, (2) Gonbad (Pol-e Gedam Abad), (3) Voshm Gir Dam outlet, (4) Pol-e Kamarbandi-e Aqqala, (5) Pol-e Khajeh Nafas, and (6) Gorganrud Estuary. Eleven water quality parameters were measured: pH, BOD₅, COD, dissolved oxygen (DO), electrical conductivity (EC), ammonium (NH₄), nitrate (NO₃), phosphate (PO₄), total hardness, turbidity, and fecal coliforms. pH, temperature, EC, and DO. Fecal coliforms were determined by the multiple tube fermentation method (MPN) according to APHA. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. One-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's HSD post-hoc test was used to compare water quality indices among stations and seasons.

Results and discussion
The IRWQIsc values ranged from 15 to 48.4 across all stations and seasons. The Gorganrud Estuary showed the highest quality (48.4, "moderate"), while Pol-e Kamarbandi-e Aqqala showed the lowest (15, "very bad"). The highest BOD (53 mg/L), COD (245 mg/L), EC (10,990 µS/cm), and fecal coliforms (996 MPN/100mL) were recorded at downstream stations. Spring: IRWQIsc ranged from 15 to 47.5. Pol-e Kamarbandi-e Aqqala (15, "very bad") and Gorganrud Estuary (47.5, "moderate") represented the extremes. Summer: IRWQIsc ranged from 20.8 to 42.3. Most stations showed "relatively bad" quality. Water quality decreased compared to spring due to reduced river flow and increased pollutant concentrations. Autumn: IRWQIsc ranged from 27 to 46.6. Voshm Gir Dam outlet (27) and Pol-e Kamarbandi-e Aqqala (28.1) showed "bad" quality, while Pol-e Shahr-e Kallaleh (46.6) showed "moderate" quality. Winter: IRWQIsc ranged from 32.1 to 48.4. The Estuary showed the highest quality (48.4, "moderate"), and most stations were classified as "relatively bad". Water quality decreased from upstream to midstream, reaching its lowest point at Pol-e Kamarbandi-e Aqqala, then showed partial recovery at downstream stations. This pattern indicates significant pollution input from Gonbad-e Kavus and Aqqala cities, followed by natural self-purification processes.

Conclusion
The water quality of the Gorganrud River is unfavorable, classified as "relatively bad" to "very bad" in most stations and seasons. Pol-e Kamarbandi-e Aqqala was identified as the most critical pollution hotspot. Analysis of spatial variations showed that water quality decreased from upstream to downstream until Aqqala, then improved at downstream stations due to natural self-purification processes. Temporal variations demonstrated better quality in wet seasons (winter and spring) due to dilution effects, although increased erosion in winter can offset this benefit at some stations. Considering the vital role of this river in agricultural water supply and feeding the International Wetland of Gorgan Bay, urgent actions are recommended: continuous water quality monitoring, proper operation of wastewater treatment plants, optimization of chemical fertilizer use, establishment of riparian buffer zones, and public awareness raising. Future studies should measure heavy metals, pesticides, and persistent organic pollutants, and extend the monitoring period over several years.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Water quality
Gorganrud River
IRWQIsc index
Water pollution
Golestan Province
1.    APHA. 2017. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (23rd ed.). American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
2.    Daechini, F., et al. 2022. Performance assessment of five water balance models for runoff simulation in the Gorganrood Watershed, Journal of Water and Soil Science, Vol. 26, No. 2, P. 263–281. (In Persian)
3.    Ebraheim, G., et al. 2020. A comparative study on the performance of NSFWQIm and IRWQIsc in water quality assessment of Sefidroud River in northern Iran, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 192, Article 677.
4.    Essalmi, S., et al. 2024. Design and application of metal organic frameworks for heavy metals adsorption in water: a review, RSC Advances, Vol. 14, P. 9365–9390.
5.    Fang, K., et al. 2025. Spatial distribution, source identification, and risk assessment of heavy metals in sediments of the Yellow River basin, China, Applied Sciences, Vol. 15, P. 1-19.
6.    Henley, W.F., et al. 2000. Effects of sedimentation and turbidity on lotic food webs: A concise review for natural resource managers, Reviews in Fisheries Science, Vol. 8, No. 2, P. 125–139.
7.    Iranian Department of Environment (IDOE). 2011. Iran water quality index for surface water resources-conventional parameters (IRWQISC). https://www.doe.ir/Portal/file/?696074/
8.    Khodami, S., et al. 2026. Assessment of heavy metal pollution (Iron, Zinc, Copper, Cadmium, Lead, and Mercury) in the sediments of the Khersan 3 dam reservoir using geochemical indicators, Journal of Environmental Science Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4, P. 10992-11001. (In Persian)
9.    Nasrollahzadeh Saravi, H., et al. 2025. Spatiotemporal analysis of water quality and identification of pollution hotspots in the Sirvan River basin using the Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) method, Iranian Water Research Journal, Vol. 19, No. 4, P. 103–114. (In Persian).
10. Noroozi, N., et al. 2020. Study of changes in water quality index of Ziarat River at 2018 in Gorgan, Journal of Research in Environmental Health, Vol. 6, No. 3, P. 250–259. (In Persian).
11.  Rahnama, B., et al. 2025. Modelling the summer and winter variations of water chemical parameters in the Gheshlaqh, Gaveroud, and Sirvan rivers, Journal of Environmental Science Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3, P. 10786–10797. (In Persian)
12. Roshani-Sefidkouhi, M., et al. 2025. Water quality assessment using IRWQIsc and NSFWQI water quality indicators; A case study: Talar River (Iran), Heliyon, Vol. 11, No. 2, Article e41812.
13.  -Sanusi, I.O., et al. 2025. Heavy metal contamination, human health impact, and remediation techniques in water bodies: a review, Discover Environment, Vol. 3, Article 268.
14.   Tian, S., et al. 2011. Study on the Self-purification of Juma River, Procedia Environmental Sciences, Vol. 11, P. 1328–1333.
15.   Uddin, M.G., et al. 2021. A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 122, Article 107218.
16. Varol, M. 2011. Assessment of heavy metal contamination in sediments of the Tigris River (Turkey) using pollution indices and multivariate statistical techniques, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 195, P. 355–364.
17.   Xu, W., et al. 2024. Introduction of heavy metals contamination in the water and soil: a review on source, toxicity and remediation methods, Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews, Vol. 17, No. 1, Article 2404235.
18.   Zare Garizi, A., et al. 2024. Evaluation of surface water quality of the Gorganrood River basin for different uses with Canadian (CCME) Water Quality Index Approach, Journal of Water and Soil Science, Vol. 28, No. 1, P. 127–143. (In Persian)