مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

ارزیابی کیفیت آب رودخانه ساری‌دره برای مصارف شرب و کشاورزی با تأکید بر هیدروشیمی آب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
دانشکده علوم زیستی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
10.22034/jess.2026.585416.2463
چکیده
رودخانه‌ها از مهم‌ترین منابع آب شیرین برای مصارف شرب، کشاورزی و صنعتی محسوب می‌شوند، اما افزایش فعالیت‌های معدنی، کشاورزی و توسعه شهری می‌تواند کیفیت این منابع را تحت تأثیر قرار دهد. رودخانه ساری‌دره در شرق استان آذربایجان شرقی و در محدوده‌ای با پتانسیل معدنی بالا واقع شده است و نقش مهمی در تأمین آب شرب و کشاورزی منطقه دارد. هدف این پژوهش ارزیابی کیفیت آب رودخانه ساری‌دره برای مصارف شرب و کشاورزی و همچنین بررسی منشأ تغییرات شیمیایی آب بود. به منظور دستیابی به این هدف، در 1404 از 14 نقطه در طول رودخانه طی دو دوره خشک و مرطوب نمونه‌برداری انجام شد. پارامترهای اندازه‌گیری شده شامل فلزات سنگین مانند آرسنیک، سرب و آهن و پارامترهای فیزیکوشیمیایی (یون‌های اصلی و عناصر کم‌مقدار) بود. همچنین کیفیت آب با بهره‌گیری از شاخص‌های متداول آبیاری، نمودارهای پایپر و ویلکاکس و تحلیل همبستگی پیرسون مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که میانگین غلظت آرسنیک، سرب و آهن به‌ترتیب 40/1، 8/6 و 017/0 میکروگرم بر لیتر و به جز چند ایستگاه با افزایش نسبی سرب، سایر مقادیر کمتر از حدود مجاز سازمان بهداشت جهانی بودند. مقادیر pH بین 77/7 تا 33/8، TDS بین 148 تا 330 میلی‌گرم بر لیتر و EC بین 297 تا 660 میکروزیمنس بر سانتی‌متر اندازه‌گیری شد که بیانگر کیفیت مناسب آب و غلبه شرایط قلیایی ضعیف است. رخساره هیدروشیمیایی غالب از نوع Ca-HCO3 و Ca-Mg-HCO3 بوده و فرآیند هوازدگی سنگ‌های کربناته مهم‌ترین عامل کنترل‌کننده شیمی آب تشخیص داده شد. نتایج تحلیل همبستگی نیز ارتباط معنی‌دار آرسنیک با سولفات، EC و TDS را نشان داد که مؤید منشأ زمین‌زاد این عنصر است. شاخص‌های کشاورزی، نمودار ویلکاکس بیانگر قرارگیری تمامی نمونه‌ها در کلاس C2-S1 و مناسب بودن آب برای آبیاری بودند. همچنین آب رودخانه از نظر مصارف صنعتی عمدتاً دارای خاصیت رسوب‌گذاری و فاقد خطر جدی خوردگی است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of water quality of the Saridareh River for drinking and agricultural purposes with emphasis on water hydrochemistry

نویسنده English

Balal Oroji
Faculty of Biological Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Rivers are considered to be the most important sources of fresh water for drinking, agricultural and industrial purposes, but the increase in mining, agricultural and urban development activities can affect the quality of these resources. The Saridareh River is located in the east of East Azerbaijan Province and in an area with high mineral potential and plays an important role in providing drinking and agricultural water in the region. The aim of this study was to evaluate the water quality of the Saridareh River for drinking and agricultural purposes and also to investigate the origin of water chemical changes. In order to achieve this goal, sampling was carried out from 14 points along the river during two dry and wet periods from August 2025 to March 2026. The measured parameters included heavy metals such as arsenic, lead and iron and physicochemical parameters (major ions and trace elements). Water quality was also evaluated using common irrigation indices, Piper and Wilcox diagrams and Pearson correlation analysis. The results showed that the average concentrations of As, Pb and Fe were 1.40, 6.8 and 0.017 μg/l respectively and except for a few stations with a relative increase in Pb, all other values were below the permissible limits of the World Health Organization. The pH values were measured between 7.77 and 8.33, TDS between 148 and 330 mg/l and EC between 297 and 660 μS/cm, which indicate good water quality and the prevalence of weak alkaline conditions. The dominant hydrochemical facies were Ca-HCO3 and Ca-Mg-HCO3, and the weathering process of carbonate rocks was identified as the most important factor controlling water chemistry. The results of the correlation analysis also showed a significant relationship between As and SO42-, EC and TDS, which confirms the terrestrial origin of this element. Agricultural indices, Wilcox plot indicated that all samples were in the C2-S1 class and the water was suitable for irrigation. Also, the river water is mainly sediment-forming and does not pose a serious risk of corrosion for industrial uses. Overall, the water quality of the Saridareh River was assessed as desirable for drinking, agricultural, and industrial uses, and geological processes and rock weathering were identified as the most important factors controlling the chemical composition of the river water.

Introduction
Rivers are considered to be the most important sources of fresh water, which play a fundamental role in providing drinking water, agriculture, and maintaining the stability of natural ecosystems. However, the development of human activities, the expansion of urbanization, the increase in mining and agricultural exploitation, as well as the natural processes of rock weathering can affect the quality of these resources. The Saridareh River is located in the city of Kalybar and, due to its location within the Arasbaran metallogenic belt and proximity to areas with mineral potential, is of particular importance from the perspective of assessing water quality and determining the origin of dissolved elements. The aim of this study was to investigate the water quality of the Saridareh River for drinking, agricultural, and industrial uses, as well as to analyze the geochemical origin of dissolved elements and ions in the water of this river.

Materials and methods
In order to achieve the research objectives, water sampling was carried out from 14 stations along the river during different hydrological periods. Physicochemical parameters including pH, EC, TDS, TH, HCO3ˉ, Clˉ, SO42- and NO3ˉ were measured. Also, the concentration of selected elements including arsenic, lead, iron, zinc, barium and other elements were determined using ICP-MS. Common drinking, agricultural and industrial indicators were used to assess water quality and the relationships between parameters were examined through Pearson correlation analysis. In addition, the hydrochemical facies of the water was assessed using the Piper diagram and the irrigability was assessed using the Wilcox diagram and USSL classification.

Results and discussion
The results showed that the average arsenic concentration was 1.40 μg/l and was lower than the World Health Organization permissible limit (10 μg/l) at all stations. Lead concentrations ranged from 0.05 to 13.43 μg/l and exceeded the drinking water guideline at several stations, which is likely due to the weathering effects of the mineral units and activities related to mineralization in the region. The average iron concentration was also much lower than the drinking water limit, indicating adequate water quality in this regard. The sulfate, chloride, and nitrate values in all samples were below standard limits, indicating limited impact of human pollutant sources on river water quality. The pH values ranged from 7.77 to 8.33 with an average of about 8.06, indicating slightly alkaline water conditions. Electrical conductivity ranged from 297 to 660 μS/cm and TDS ranged from 148 to 330 mg/l, indicating that the water is sweet and the risk of salinity is low. The results of the correlation analysis showed that arsenic has a positive and significant correlation with sulfate, EC and TDS, indicating a common terrane origin and the role of weathering of sulfide minerals in the release of this element. Also, sulfate showed a strong and significant correlation with EC and TDS, confirming its role in controlling the ionic load of water. The study of water quality for agricultural purposes showed that all samples fall into the C2-S1 class, which indicates water with moderate salinity and low sodium risk. Low levels of sodium, chloride and sulfate indicate that the water is suitable for irrigation of most crops and horticultural crops in the region. The results of the Wilcox plot also showed that most samples are in the "excellent to good" and "good to acceptable" ranges and that long-term use of this water does not pose a significant risk in terms of soil salinization or sodium. From an industrial perspective, 13 stations had sedimentation properties and only one station had corrosive properties, indicating that the river water mainly tends to form calcium carbonate deposits in industrial facilities.

Conclusion
According to the Piper diagram, the dominant facies of the river water are Ca-HCO3 and Ca-Mg-HCO3, indicating that the water chemistry is controlled by the weathering process of carbonate rocks and the dissolution of minerals containing calcium and magnesium. Overall, the results of this study indicate that the water quality of the Saridareh River is suitable for drinking and agricultural purposes, and natural geological processes and rock weathering are the most important factors controlling the chemical composition of the water. However, the observation of relatively high concentrations of lead at some stations highlights the need for continuous monitoring of this element and assessment of the possible effects of mining activities in the catchment area.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Saridareh River
Heavy metals
Hydrogeochemicals
Lead
Arsenic
1.       Abdollahi, Azam 2009. Study of alteration and mineralization of the Sari Darreh region north of Shanivardagh-Ahar. Payam Noor University of East Azerbaijan Province, Faculty of Basic Sciences. (In Persian)
2.       Abdul, R. M., Arhin, E., & Arhin Jnr, A. A. 2023. Mineralogy and geochemistry of geophagic materials at Mfensi-Adankwame in the Ashanti region of Ghana and possible health implications. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 7(4), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2021.1952775
3.       Abdulkerim, E., Fufa, F., & Takala, W. 2022. Identification of groundwater recharge site using geographical information system and remote sensing: case study of Sude district, Oromia, Ethiopia. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10170-w
4.       Aghazadeh, M. 2009. Study of alteration and mineralization of the Sari Darreh region (north of Shivardagh-Ahar), Tarbiat Modares University. (In Persian)
5.       Ahmadi, H., Kaya, O. A., Babadagi, E., Savas, T., & Pekkan, E. 2020. GIS-based groundwater potentiality mapping using AHP and FR models in central antalya, Turkey. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECG2020-08741
6.       Babakhani, A. R. 1989. Description of the geological map of the Ahar quadrangle, scale 1:250,000. Tehran: Geological and Mineral Exploration Organization of the country. (In Persian)
7.       Bhatt, D., Swain, M., & Yadav, D. 2025. Artificial intelligence based detection and control strategies for river water pollution: A comprehensive review. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 104541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2025.104541
8.       Cengiz, M. F., Kilic, S., Yalcin, F., Kilic, M., & Gurhan Yalcin, M. 2017. Evaluation of heavy metal risk potential in Bogacayi River water (Antalya, Turkey). Environmental monitoring and assessment, 189(6), 248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5925-3
9.       Das, A. 2025a. Water pollution and water quality assessment and application of criterion impact loss (CILOS), geographical information system (GIS), artificial neural network (ANN) and decision-learning technique in river water quality management: An experiment on the Mahanadi catchment, Odisha, India. Desalination and Water Treatment, 321, 100969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100969
10.   Das, A. 2025b. Surface water potential zones delineation and spatiotemporal variation characteristics of water pollution and the cause of pollution formation in Brahmani River Basin, Odisha. HydroResearch, 8, 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100969
11.   Falah, F., Haghizadeh, A. Hydrochemical 2017. Evaluation of river water quality-a case study: Horroud River. Appl Water Sci 7, 4725–4733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-017-0635-0
12.   Gao, M., Chen, X., Singh, S. K., & Wei, L. 2022. An improved method to estimate the rate of change of streamflow recession and basin synthetic recession parameters from hydrographs. Journal of Hydrology, 604, 127254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127254
13.   Gao, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, C., Xing, C., Tan, W., Wu, H., ... & Liu, C. 2023. Assessing the impact of urban form and urbanization process on tropospheric nitrogen dioxide pollution in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Environmental Pollution, 336, 122436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122436
14.   Genjula, W., Jothimani, M., Gunalan, J., & Abebe, A. 2023. Applications of statistical and AHP models in groundwater potential mapping in the Mensa river catchment, Omo river valley, Ethiopia. Model Earth Syst Environ 9: 4057–4075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01765-8
15.   Gharahi, N., Fathian, MM., Jafari, A., & Bahmani, M. 2026. Comprehensive assessment of pollution indicators in agricultural soils around the Zayandeh Rood River in Isfahan. Journal of Environmental Science Studies, 10(4), 10836-10847.
16.   Khalili, R., Zali, A., & Motaghi, H. 2021. Evaluating the heavy metals in the water and sediments of Haraz River, using pollution load index (PLI) and geo accumulation index (Igeo). Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 52(4), 933-942. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2021.316080.668850
17.   Khodami, S., Eskandari, T., Nasrollahzadeh Saravi, H., Rahnama, B., Khoshnamvand, M., Rezaei, M., & Younesipour, H. 2026. Assessment of heavy metal pollution (Iron, Zinc, Copper, Cadmium, Lead, and Mercury) in the sediments of the Khersan 3 dam reservoir using geochemical indicators. Journal of Environmental Science Studies, 10(4), 10992-11001.
18.   Koukina, S. E., & Lobus, N. V. 2020. Relationship between enrichment, toxicity, and chemical bioavailability of heavy metals in sediments of the Cai River estuary. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 192(5), 305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08282-6
19.   kumar Mallick, S., Maity, B., Das, P., & Rudra, S. 2023. GIS-based groundwater recharge potentiality analysis using frequency ratio and weights of evidence models. In Case studies in geospatial applications to groundwater resources (pp. 91-108). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99963-2.00016-X
20.   Limazie, M. S., & Woni, S. 2024. Foreign direct investment and carbon emissions in ECOWAS: does good governance matter?. Journal of Economics and Development, 26(2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-08-2023-0158
21.   Mishra, R. K. 2023. Fresh water availability and its global challenge. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(3), 1-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0207
22.   Naz, S., Habib, S. S., Arshad, M., Majeed, S., & Mohany, M. 2025. Seasonal trends in heavy metal pollution and water quality in the Chashma (Indus River, Pakistan): A study on environmental health risks. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 236(10), 670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-025-08317-z
23.   Panagopoulos, A. 2022. Brine management (saline water & wastewater effluents): Sustainable utilization and resource recovery strategy through Minimal and Zero Liquid Discharge (MLD & ZLD) desalination systems. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 176, 108944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2022.108944
24.   Pérez, P. A., Quiroz, W., & Echeveste, P. 2026. Coupled pollution and water scarcity heighten ecological degradation and social vulnerability in global dryland rivers. Environmental Research, 123708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2026.123708
25.   Rahmati, O., Melesse, A. M., & Naghibi, A. 2026. Water scarcity crisis: overview of challenges and solutions. Water Scarcity Management, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-26722-2.00027-1
26.   Ramin, M., Nasrollahzadeh Saravi, H., Dostar, M., Ghasemi, H., Pourang, N., & Baniamam, M. 2017. Study on Trace Elements (Mo, Cu, Hg and As) in Water and Sediments in Aras River in East Azerbaijan Province.
27.   Safizadeh, E., Karimi, D., Ghafarzadeh, H. R., & Poorhashemi, S. A. 2020. Environmental of Aras River Environmental Pollution. Geographical Research, 35(2), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.29252/geores.35.2.167
28.   Shahmohammadi, K. S., & Habibzadeh, N. 2017. Assessment of geochemical and distribution of heavy metals Pb, Cu, Zn and Ni in the Aras free trade-industrial zone.
29.   Shakeri, R., Amini, H., Fakheri, F., Lam, M. Y., & Zahraie, B. 2025. Comparative analysis of correlation and causality inference in water quality problems with emphasis on TDS Karkheh River in Iran. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 2798. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85908-0
30.   Solgi, E., & Sheikhzadeh, H. 2016. Study of Water Quality of Aras River Using Physico- Chemical Variables. Iran-Water Resources Research, 12(3), 207-213.
31.   USEPA (United State Environmental Protection Agency) 2016. Integrated Risk Information System. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/iris(accessed on 4 July 2024).
32.   Varatharajan, G. R., Ndayishimiye, J. C., & Nyirabuhoro, P. 2025. Emerging contaminants: a rising threat to urban water and a barrier to achieving SDG-aligned planetary protection. Water, 17(16), 2367. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17162367
33.   Whig, P., Banerjee, S., Achanta, P. R. D., & Whig, A. 2026. Impact of environmental pollution on food security: concepts and issues. Sustainable solutions for environmental pollution, 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-33145-9.00010-9
34.   WHO 2017. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (4th ed.). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549950ISBN: 978-92-4-154995-0
35.   Zarei, E., Noori, R., Jun, C., Bateni, S. M., Kianmehr, P., & Zhu, S. 2025. A comprehensive water chemistry dataset for Iranian rivers. Scientific Data, 12(1), 1646. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05932-7
36.   Zhang, W., Ma, L., Abuduwaili, J., Ge, Y., Issanova, G., & Saparov, G. 2019. Hydrochemical characteristics and irrigation suitability of surface water in the Syr Darya River, Kazakhstan. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 191(9), 572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7713-8
37.   Zhu, Y., Chen, Z., & Asif, Z. 2021. Identification of point source emission in river pollution incidents based on Bayesian inference and genetic algorithm: Inverse modeling, sensitivity, and uncertainty analysis. Environmental Pollution, 285, 117497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117497