مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

مطالعات علوم محیط زیست

پروژه‌های مگا آب‌شیرین‌کن به‌عنوان محرک‌ تغییر کاربری اراضی ساحلی و اثرات آن بر اکوسیستم‌های دریایی: مرور سیستماتیک شواهد جهانی با دلالت‌هایی برای خلیج فارس و دریای عمان

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان
گروه محیط زیست، واحد بندر عباس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بندرعباس، ایران
10.22034/jess.2026.587668.2466
چکیده
گسترش روز افزون پروژه‌های مگا آب‌شیرین‌کن (نمک‌زدایی بزرگ مقیاس) در مناطق خشک و نیمه‌خشک ساحلی، به‌ویژه در خلیج فارس و دریای عمان، پیامدهایی فراتر از تأمین آب شیرین ایجاد کرده است که تاکنون این پبامد‌ها به‌صورت روشمند و منسجم مورد بررسی قرار نگرفته‌اند. این مطالعه با بهره‌گیری از یک مرور سیستماتیک، به بررسی پیوندهای ساختاری میان نمک‌زدایی بزرگ‌مقیاس، تغییر کاربری اراضی ساحلی، تخریب اکوسیستم‌های دریایی و بروز تعارضات اجتماعی-زیست‌محیطی می‌پردازد. با تحلیل چند وجهی مطالعات بین‌المللی و منطقه‌ای در سامانه‌های دریایی با شرایط اقلیمی، اقیانوس‌شناختی و نهادی مشابه خلیج فارس و دریای عمان، نشان داده می‌شود که نمک‌زدایی نه‌تنها یک فناوری تأمین آب، بلکه محرکی فضایی-نهادی برای بازآرایی سرزمینی سواحل است.
یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که هم‌مکانی تأسیسات نمک‌زدایی با خوشه‌های صنعتی ساحلی، موجب تثبیت الگوهای صنعتی کاربری زمین، کاهش انعطاف‌پذیری اکوسیستم‌ها و تشدید اثرات تجمعی زیست‌محیطی می‌شود. در دریاهای نیمه‌بسته‌ای مانند خلیج فارس، این فرایندها از طریق برهم‌کنش با شوری و دمای زمینه‌ای بالا، دامنه و شدت اثرات اکولوژیکی را تقویت می‌کنند. افزون بر این، ساختارهای حکمرانی متمرکز و بخشی، با ناتوانی در مدیریت اثرات تجمعی و مشارکت ذی‌نفعان محلی، نقش تعیین‌کننده‌ای در تبدیل فشارهای محیطی به تعارضات نهفته اجتماعی ایفا می‌کنند. این مطالعه با ارائه یک مدل مفهومی یکپارچه، نشان می‌دهد که تعارضات مرتبط با نمک‌زدایی حاصل ناهماهنگی میان مقیاس فناوری، ظرفیت اکولوژیکی و سازوکارهای حکمرانی است. نتایج بر ضرورت بازتعریف نمک‌زدایی در چارچوب مدیریت یکپارچه مناطق ساحلی و برنامه‌ریزی حساس به تعارض تأکید دارد و مسیرهایی برای کاهش ریسک‌های بلندمدت زیست‌محیطی و اجتماعی در مناطق ساحلی خشک ارائه می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Mega-Desalination Projects as Drivers of Coastal Land Use Change and Marine Ecosystem Impacts: A Systematic Review of Global Evidence with Implications for the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman

نویسندگان English

Mohsen Dehghani Ghanatghestani
Akbar Ghodousiyan
Department of Environment, B.A. C. Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran
چکیده English

Abstract
Mega-desalination projects have become a central strategy for addressing water scarcity in arid coastal regions, yet their broader spatial and governance implications remain insufficiently examined. While prior studies have largely focused on operational impacts such as brine discharge, limited attention has been given to desalination-driven coastal land use change and its cumulative ecological and social consequences. This systematic review synthesizes global evidence on how mega-desalination projects act as drivers of coastal land transformation and assesses their impacts on marine and coastal ecosystems as well as emerging socio-environmental conflicts.
Following PRISMA guidelines, peer-reviewed articles and authoritative international reports published in this decade were systematically screened across major scientific databases. Thirty high-relevance studies were included and analyzed using an integrated framework that links land use change, ecosystem impacts, and governance dynamics. The findings indicate that mega-desalination projects often serve as spatial anchors for industrial clustering and shoreline hardening, resulting in habitat degradation, increased salinity and thermal stress, and reduced ecosystem resilience. Furthermore, governance gaps—characterized by centralized planning, limited stakeholder participation, and unequal cost–benefit distribution—emerge as key drivers of conflict between governments, local communities, and environmental systems. These insights are particularly relevant for the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman, where rapid desalination expansion intersects with ecological vulnerability and contested coastal governance.

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Introduction

The accelerating deployment of large-scale seawater desalination has become a defining feature of water security strategies in arid and semi-arid coastal regions worldwide. Nowhere is this trend more pronounced than in the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman, where desalination supplies a dominant share of municipal and industrial freshwater demand. Despite its growing strategic importance, desalination is still predominantly conceptualized as a technical and sectoral solution to water scarcity. Such framing underestimates its role as a transformative coastal intervention that reshapes land use patterns, marine ecosystems, and governance relations simultaneously. This extended abstract synthesizes findings from a systematic review of international and Persian-language literature to examine desalination as a coupled land–sea system driver and a latent source of socio-environmental conflict.
Previous desalination research has focused primarily on near-field marine impacts, particularly brine discharge, thermal loading, and chemical additives. While these effects are well documented, they represent only one dimension of a broader transformation process. Recent studies increasingly highlight that mega-desalination plants are rarely isolated facilities; rather, they are embedded within industrialized coastal corridors that include power generation, petrochemical complexes, ports, and logistics hubs. This spatial co-location produces long-term land use change through shoreline hardening, land reclamation, exclusion zones, and altered coastal accessibility. However, the cumulative implications of these land-based transformations for marine ecosystem resilience and social conflict remain underexplored, particularly in semi-enclosed seas with limited flushing capacity such as the Persian Gulf

Methods and Analytical Framework
This study systematically reviews 30 peer-reviewed international and Persian-language publications, selected based on relevance to desalination impacts, coastal land use change, marine ecology, and governance in arid coastal settings. The analysis integrates empirical field studies, remote sensing assessments, oceanographic modelling, life-cycle analyses, and governance-oriented research. Findings are synthesized using a socio-ecological systems framework that links technological scale, spatial planning, ecological stress pathways, and institutional capacity. The Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman are treated as focal case regions due to their extreme baseline conditions—high temperature, salinity, and evaporation rates—and their unparalleled density of desalination infrastructure.

Results and discussion
Desalination as a Driver of Coastal Land Use Transformation: Across the reviewed literature, desalination facilities consistently emerge as anchoring infrastructure that catalyses durable coastal land use reconfiguration. Studies show that plant siting decisions often prioritize proximity to energy supply, deep-water access, and industrial zones, reinforcing patterns of coastal industrial clustering. These processes convert previously multifunctional or ecologically sensitive shorelines into permanently industrialized landscapes. Remote sensing and GIS-based studies from the southern Iranian coast and Arabian Peninsula confirm accelerated shoreline modification, land reclamation, and loss of natural coastal buffers in proximity to desalination and associated infrastructure. Such spatial transformations generate path dependency, constraining future coastal management options and locking regions into high-impact development trajectories.
Ecological Impacts Beyond Brine Discharge: While brine discharge remains a central concern, the reviewed evidence demonstrates that ecological degradation linked to desalination arises through interacting stress pathways rather than single mechanisms. Field studies in the Persian Gulf document localized increases in salinity, temperature, and heavy metal concentrations in sediments near outfalls, accompanied by declines in microbenthic diversity and shifts in community composition. Modelling studies indicate that although basin-scale salinity increases may appear modest, near-field impacts frequently exceed ecological tolerance thresholds, particularly in shallow coastal environments. Importantly, land use change associated with desalination—such as shoreline armouring and habitat removal—reduces ecosystem resilience by eliminating natural buffers, seagrass meadows, mangroves, and tidal flats that would otherwise mitigate cumulative stress. In semi-enclosed systems, these spatial effects amplify the ecological footprint of desalination far beyond discharge zones.

Governance and the Emergence of Socio-Environmental Conflict: A key finding of this review is that environmental degradation does not automatically translate into overt conflict; rather, conflict emergence is mediated by governance structures. Desalination-intensive regions, particularly in the Persian Gulf, are characterized by centralized decision-making, sectoral fragmentation, and limited stakeholder participation. Environmental impact assessments are typically conducted at the project scale, failing to capture cumulative land–sea interactions and long-term coastal transformation [3]. As a result, coastal communities often experience restricted access to shorelines, declining fisheries, and degraded marine environments, while the primary benefits of desalinated water are transferred to distant urban or industrial users. This distributional asymmetry reframes environmental impacts as issues of procedural justice and legitimacy, creating conditions for latent and persistent socio-environmental conflict even in politically stable contexts.
An Integrated Conceptual Model: Synthesizing these findings, the study proposes an integrated conceptual model in which desalination-driven coastal conflict emerges from misalignments among four interdependent components: (1) technological and spatial drivers, including plant scale and industrial co-location; (2) ecological stress pathways, encompassing cumulative impacts on marine and coastal ecosystems; (3) governance filters, such as regulatory coherence, institutional coordination, and transboundary arrangements; and (4) social and distributional dynamics that shape how costs and benefits are perceived and allocated. Conflict is thus understood as structural and systemic, rather than episodic or project-specific.
Implications for the Persian Gulf and Comparable Regions: The Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman exemplify regions where rapid desalination expansion coincides with ecological fragility, accelerating coastal industrialization, and evolving socio-political dynamics. Without integrated coastal zone management, strategic environmental assessment, and regional coordination, continued reliance on mega-desalination risks pushing already stressed marine ecosystems beyond critical thresholds. The findings underscore the need to reconceptualize desalination as a coastal land use intervention with systemic socio-ecological consequences, rather than a neutral technological solution to water scarcity.

Conclusion
This extended abstract demonstrates that the sustainability challenges associated with desalination are fundamentally spatial, ecological, and institutional in nature. Addressing them requires moving beyond project-based mitigation toward cumulative, conflict-sensitive, and ecosystem-informed planning frameworks. Such a shift is essential for ensuring the long-term environmental integrity and social legitimacy of desalination-driven water security strategies in the Persian Gulf, the Sea of Oman, and analogous arid coastal regions.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Mega-desalination
Coastal land use change
Socio-environmental conflict
Persian Gulf
Sea of Oman
1.       A. Bond, J. Morrison-Saunders, and R. Howitt (Eds.), Sustainability Assessment: Pluralism, Practice and Progress. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2012
2.       A. Elsaid, M. Kamil, M. A. Sayed, and M. A. Abdelkareem, “Environmental impact of desalination technologies: A review,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 748, Art. no. 141528, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141528
3.       A. Shokri and M. Sanavi Fard, “Techno-economic assessment of water desalination: Future outlooks and challenges,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 169, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.007
4.       B. Orlove and S. C. Caton, “Water sustainability: Anthropological approaches and prospects,” Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 39, pp. 401–415, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105045
5.       B. S. Halpern, F. Frazier, and co-authors, “Cumulative impacts to global marine ecosystems projected to more than double by mid-century,” MARINE ECOLOGY, vol. 389, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adv2906
6.       C. M. Botero e, and co-authors, “The Multiple Challenges Faced by Coastal and Marine Governance,” Water, vol. 17, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152322
7.       C. Moreno-Silva, L. Pagliero, N. McIntyre, et al., “Environmental and social impacts from desalinated water supply projects,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 115, Art. no. 107961, Aug. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107961 
8.       C. Sheppard, A. Al-Husiani, F. Al-Jamali, F. Al-Yamani, R. Baldwin, J. Bishop, et al., “The Gulf: A young sea in decline,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 13–38, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.10.017  
9.       D. A. Roberts, E. L. Johnston, and N. A. Knott, “Impacts of desalination plant discharges on the marine environment: A critical review of published studies,” Water Research, vol. 44, no. 18, pp. 5117–5128, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.04.036
10.   E. Jones, M. Qadir, M. T. H. van Vliet, V. Smakhtin, and S.-M. Kang, “The state of desalination and brine production: A global outlook,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 657, pp. 1343–1356, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.076 
11.   F. Paparella, M. Barretta, A. Berti, and co-authors, “Long-term, basin-scale salinity impacts from desalination in the Arabian/Persian Gulf,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, Art. no. 20549, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25167-5
12.   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), The State of the World's Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture – Systems at Breaking Point (SOLAW 2021). Rome, Italy: FAO, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/bc8810ae-2a13-4cfe-b019-339158c7e608/content/cb7654en.html
13.   G. Matters, “The desalination process gives us freshwater—at a huge environmental cost,” World Economic Forum, Dec. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/12/desalination-process-freshwater-negative-environmental-cost/
14.   H. A. Naser, “Marine Ecosystem Diversity in the Arabian Gulf,” in Environmental Change in the Arabian Gulf, IntechOpen, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5772/57425
15.   H. D. Ibrahim, and co-authors, “Impact of brine discharge from seawater desalination plants on Persian Gulf salinity,” Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 145, no. 9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001604
16.   H. Hosseini, M. Naderloo, A. Danekar, and co-authors, “Marine health of the Arabian Gulf: Drivers of pollution and assessment approaches focusing on desalination activities,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 164, Art. no. 112085, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112085.
17.   H. Shemer and R. Semiat, “Sustainable RO desalination – Energy demand and environmental impact,” Desalination, vol. 424, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.09.021
18.   I. Al Abri, and co-authors, “Assessing marine sustainability in the Gulf Region: A comparative analysis using the ocean health index with a focus on Oman,” Food and Humanity, vol. 5, Art. no. 100942, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100942
19.   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, H.-O. Pörtner et al., Eds. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.
20.   M. Al-Saidi, I. Saadaoui, and R. Ben-Hamadou, “Governing desalination, managing the brine: A review and systematization of regulatory and socio-technical issues,” Water Resources and Industry, vol. 30, Art. no. 100225, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2023.100225
21.   M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, Art. no. n71, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
22.   M. R. Riegl and J. A. Purkis, Eds., Coral Reefs of the Gulf: Adaptation to Climatic Extremes. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3008-3
23.   M. Sharifinia, M. Keshavarzifard, P. Hossein Khezri, et al., “Impact of desalination plant brine discharge on macrobenthic communities in the Persian Gulf,” Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, vol. 230, Art. no. 105465, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2025.105465 
24.   M. Sharifinia, M. Keshavarzifard, P. Hosseinkhezri, M. H. Khanjani, C. K. Yap, W. O. Smith, M. Daliri, and A. Haghshenas, “The impact assessment of desalination plant discharges on heavy metal pollution in the coastal sediments of the Persian Gulf,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 178, Art. no. 113599, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113599
25.   M. Villada-Canela, “Understanding social aspects on desalination for community adaptation and resilience in Baja California, México,” Social Sciences, vol. 14, no. 2, Art. no. 110, 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020110
26.   P. Gupta and M. D. Arciniegas-Perez, “Impact of Brine Discharge from Desalination Plants on Marine Ecosystems: A Review,” Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, vol. 49, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2025.100693
27.   R. Sirota, and co-authors, “Impacts of desalination brine discharge on benthic ecosystems,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 58, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c07748
28.   Regional Organization for the Protection of the Marine Environment (ROPME), State of the Marine Environment Report (SOMER): Sustainability Message to Decision-Makers. Kuwait City, Kuwait: ROPME, 2013.
29.   S. Lattemann and T. Höpner, “Environmental impact and impact assessment of seawater desalination,” Desalination, vol. 220, nos. 1–3, pp. 1–15, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.03.009
30.   T. M. Missimer and R. G. Maliva, “Environmental issues in seawater reverse osmosis desalination: Intakes and outfalls,” Desalination, vol. 434, pp. 198–215, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.07.012
31.   UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP), The United Nations World Water Development Report 2020: Water and Climate Change. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2020.
32.   United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Consolidated Background Paper of the Discussion Papers Presented at the First Meeting of the Ad Hoc Open-Ended Expert Group on Marine Litter and Microplastics. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP, 2018.
33.   United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Desalination and the Environment: Impacts, Mitigation and Governance. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP, 2022.
34.   World Bank, “Governance and Economics of Desalination and Reuse,” Governance and Economics of Desalination and Reuse Washington, D.C., 2025.
35.   پ. قشقایی، م. صفاری، م. دلیری، و 1. کامرانی، «بررسی پیامدهای زیست‌محیطی تخلیه پساب آب‌شیرین‌کن‌ها بر اکوسیستم‌های دریایی و اثرات آن بر سلامت انسان: یک مطالعه مروری»، فصلنامه طب دریا، سال 7، شماره 3، 1404   https://doi.org/10.30491/7.3.174
36.   ل. تقوی و همکاران، «بررسی اثرات ناشی از آب‌شیرین‌کن‌های صنعتی بر اکوسیستم آبی خلیج فارس»، نشریه پایداری، توسعه و محیط زیست، ۱۳۹۵، https://www.magiran.com/p1690877
37.   م. فرمهینی فرهانی و همکاران، « سنجش پیشروی کاربری اراضی شهری و انسان ساخت به سمت خط ساحلی در محدوده ساحلی استان هرمزگان»، فصلنامه محیط زیست جانوری، ۱۴۰۲، دوره: 15، شماره: 1، https://aejournals.org/index.php/AEJ/article/view/480/475
38.   مرتضی بخشایش، مریم فراهانی، و آزیتا بهبهانی نیا، « بکارگیری ارزیابی چرخه حیات (LCA) در مقایسه اثرات محیط زیستی سامانه های نمک زدایی اسمز معکوس با آبگیری مستقیم از دریا و چاه‌های ساحلی در سامانه‌های نمک زدایی چابهار و کنگان»، مجله تحقیقات منابع آب ایران، دوره: 16، ش: 1، ۱۳۹۹، https://sid.ir/paper/403384/fa